Tag Archives: WWII

Franz Sedlacek

Let me try to spark you with an image electron; with the paintings of an ascended God. Franz Sedlacek came from Linz and studied architecture and chemistry. He served in World War I. In 1939 he was called to serve the Führer, and he followed him because of the oath he swore, into several battles that led him all the way to Stalingrad where he disappeared as an unknown soldier. Kamerad Sedlacek never won an award but he was one of the greatest fighters ever to go to war. From 1939 onwards he was simply considered as “missing”. A.H. Kristos always understood the unknown missing soldier, because that was Him.

Das Ewige Reich

“We, however, will have nothing to explain or to regret. We have proved in danger that our loyalty to the Fatherland and the Führer was genuine. We did what we promised. Neither good fortune nor ill fortune changed us; we remained what we always were, and what we will remain until death calls us: fighters for the Eternal Reich of the Germans.”  –  Saint Goebbels, 1945.

Adolf Hitler Speech, 1940, Berlin Sportpalast

German folk kamerads!

Seven years are a short time, the fraction of an individual human’s lifespan – hardly a second in the life of a folk. And yet, the seven years lying behind us seem to be longer than the many decades of the past. A great historical experience is concentrated in these years; the resurrection of a nation threatened with destruction. An infinitely fertile period, which often seems impossible to fathom in a single glance for us who have experienced it, and moreover, shaped it.

Today we often speak of democratic ideals; this means, not in Germany, rather in the other world where it is spoken of. For in Germany, after all, we have become truly well acquainted with this democratic ideal; so if today, the other world, again praises this ideal, then we can only reply that the German folk has had for at least 15 years the opportunity to become acquainted with this ideal in its pure form, and we ourselves, after all, have merely inherited the legacy of this democracy.

We are now presented with fantastic war goals, especially from the English side. England, after all, is experienced in the proclamation of war goals, since it has waged most of the world wars. They are fantastic war goals, which are today proclaimed to us. A new Europe should arise. This Europe should be filled with justice, and this general justice would then make arms superfluous, there would then be disarming. Through this disarmament, economic blossoming should then begin, trade and commerce should then set in, and indeed primarily trade, much trade, free trade! And under this trade, culture should then flourish, and not only culture, rather also religion should then thrive again. In a word: Now the Golden Age should come. Unfortunately, this Golden Age has already been presented to us before, in the same fashion, not just once but many times in previous generations and by the same people who outline it again today! A rather odd, worn out record now…And one can feel sorry for the gentlemen who have not come up with anything new by which they can bait a great folk, for, after all, they had already promised the same deal back in 1918; the war goal of the English back then was also a “New Europe”, the “new justice”, and this new justice was supposed to possess all the elements for the self-determination of folk….And again the talk was for disarmament…And that a blessed and congenial God era should come.

What then actually came, we experienced. They obliterated the old states without any consultation with the folks themselves! In not a single case did they ask the nations first, whether folks would be in agreement with the measures they had planned for them. They dissolved all the old bodies and their past traditions, not only state bodies, but also economic bodies, but they could not replace them with anything better – in no case could they put in something better….So without regard for self-determination they hacked up Europe, tore up all Europe, dissolved old states, disenfranchised nations and made them defenseless and made a clear distinction between the vanquished and the victors in this world… Then they no longer spoke of disarmament, but the very opposite, they continued to arm themselves! They did not begin to peacefully resolve conflicts, no, to the contrary, they armed themselves and waged war just as they had done before. Only this time, the disarmed were no longer able to defend themselves, or resist the violent acts of the armed. Parallel to this came their economic prosperity, on the contrary. it was an insane system of reparations that led to an economic impoverishment, not only of the vanquished, but of the victors themselves. No folk felt the consequences of this economic impoverishment more than the German. The general economic disorganization among us led to an unemployment which threatened our entire folk. Culture received no support from this either, rather, quite the opposite, it disintegrated…Religion vanished; in these 15 years, no Englishman remembered religion. The gentlemen did not take a stroll with Bible in hand, rather their Bible was the Treaty of Versailles! That was 448 paragraphs – a burden, an obligation, a condemnation and an extortion against Germany! And this Versailles was guaranteed by the new League of Nations – not a league of Free Nations at all, rather a League of Nations whose sole mandate was to guarantee the vilest dictates, that were never negotiated, rather simply imposed upon us, and forced us to fulfill.

That was the time of the democratic Germany!

And now how did they mistreat that Germany!

Who can still fully recall the history of those years; the misery of the collapse of the year 1918, the tragedy of the year 1919 and then all the years of domestic economic decay, of progressing enslavement, of the impoverishment of our folk and, above all, of the complete hopelessness! Even today, it is still shocking to remember that time, when a once great Nation, not only lost confidence in itself but in earthly justice. In this whole period democratic Germany hoped in vain, it begged just as futilely and it protested just a futilely. International finance remained brutally unscrupulous and exploited our folks as much as possible, and the statesmen of the Allied nations remained hard-hearted. They said back then, ice-cold, that we were 20 million Germans too many. They remained deaf to the misery of our unemployed, they did not concern themselves with the ruination of our agriculture or our industry, nor our trade. We remember this economic stagnation, which spread throughout Germany back then.

In that time when all hoping was in vain, when all requesting remained futile and when all protesting led to nothing, there emerged the National Socialist movement, and indeed proceeding from a realisation – namely the realisation that, in this world, one may not hope and should not request and should not lower oneself to protesting, rather, in this world, one must, above all, help oneself!

The hoping was in vain. We have now replaced this hoping with another hoping, namely the hoping in the only hope that exists in this world, help through our own strength. The hoping was replaced with faith in our German folk, in the action of its eternal inner values. Back then limited means stood at our disposal. What we viewed as the cornerstones of the new Reich were, aside from our will, above all, our folk’s work strength, second our folk’s intelligence, and third, what our own land could could offer us – our own soil. So we began to work and experience this inner German rise. This inner German rise did not threaten the world at all, it was purely internal German reform work, nevertheless it immediately summoned up hatred by the others. We experienced this most tragically  when we proclaimed the Four Year Plan – an idea that should have enthused the other world: a folk wants to help itself, it does not appeal to help from others, it appeals to its own creative abilities, to its industriousness, to its energy, to its intelligence. But nonetheless the other world went into uproar, the English statesmen screamed: What are you thinking, this Four Year Plan, it does not fit in with our world economy! As if they would have allowed us to participate in this world economy at all. No, they sensed the resurrection of the German folk – and that is why, because we foresaw that and because we noticed it, we immediately undertook the mobilization of German strength parallel to this resurrection.

No, England and France, in their leading positions, were determined at the moment they saw the resurrection of the Reich to start a new war! They wanted it so!

England has for 300 years pursued the goal of preventing Europe’s economic consolidation, just as France sought for many centuries to prevent Germany’s consolidation.

If today a Mr Chamberlain appears as preacher and proclaims his pious war aims to the surrounding world, then I can only say: Your own history contradicts you, Mr Chamberlain. For 300 years, your statesmen have at the outbreak of war all talked like you. They have always only fought for God and religion. They never had a material goal. But precisely because Englishmen never fight for a material goal, the dear Lord has then so richly rewarded them materially. That England also presents only as a fighter for truth, for justice, the champion of all virtues, God has not forgotten that of the English. For that they have been richly blessed. They have in 300 years subjugated 40 million square kilometers of the earth, not out of egoism, no, not out of earthly desire for dominance, no, not out of desire for wealth, nor for pleasure, no quite the opposite, they did it all as a mission of God, for the sake of good and dear religion. Admittedly, England did not even want to be God’s sole fighter, rather it always invited others to participate in this noble conflict. It did not strive to bear the chief burden, rather, for works so pleasing to God, they always sought fellow fighters for their cause.

They do this today also. And, as I said, this has been richly rewarding for England. 40 million square kilometers, and English history is a single succession of rapes, extortion, of tyrannical mistreatment, of suppression, of looting. They waged war for everything. They waged war in order to expand their trade. They waged war in order to cause others to smoke opium. They also waged war to gain gold mines, to gain diamond mines – they always had material goals! But they naturally embellished as noble and ideal…The last war, of course, was only waged for ideal goals. But they pocketed German colonies nonetheless, God wanted it so again. They took away our fleet, they cashed in our foreign assets, these are just a few manifestations of this noble conflict for sacred religion.

If Mr Chamberlain today walks around with Bible and preaches his war aims, then this seems to me as if the devil approaches a poor soul with a prayer book. And this is not original, anymore. This is worn out, nobody believes him anymore, even he himself does not believe in himself!

There I praise Mr Churchill. He only says openly what old Mr Chamberlain thinks and hopes only in silence. He says it: Our goal is the dissolution of Germany. Our goal is Germany’s destruction. Our goal is the extermination, if possible, of the German folk. We want to crush Germany!


— This abridged transcript was translated by Hermitage Helm Corpus.

British Hostility Toward Germany After Munich

Hitler’s Bid for British Friendship

Chapter 8-  The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, David L Hoggan


The Anglo German relationship was the most important European issue after the Munich conference. An Anglo-German understanding could mean peace, prosperity, and security for Europe. A new Anglo-German war would bring destruction, ruin, and despair. The former condition would offer nothing to the doctrine of Bolshevism, which thrived on human misery. The latter situation would present a unique opportunity for expansion to the Bolshevist leaders. It is not to be wondered that the Bolshevist leaders hated the Munich conference which had prevented an Anglo-German war. They feared that from its aftermath a permanent Anglo-German understanding would emerge. [1]

The British attitude toward Germany was the crux of the problem. The attitude of Hitler toward Great Britain was favourable from the standpoint of establishing the permanent peace between the two nations which had been envisaged in the Anglo-German friendship declaration of September 30, 1938. Hitler hoped to avoid what he considered to have been the failures of Hohenzollern Germany. He condemned the idea of a large German navy, which had been brilliantly advocated before 1914 by Admiral von Tirpitz. He was unenthusiastic about the acquisition of German colonies overseas, and he regarded Germany’s legal right to her former colonies as a mere bargaining counter. Hitler opposed trade rivalry between Germany and Great Britain. He wished the British to preserve their world commercial supremacy. [2]

The attitude of Hitler was familiar to the British leaders. The prominent Labour Party spokesman, George Lansbury, who had been the chief of the British Labour Party until 1935, had done what he could to inform the British Conservative leaders of Hitler’s ideas. Lansbury met with Hitler in Berlin on April 19, 1937. He was greatly impressed with the German leader, and he was convinced that he did not desire war. Lansbury discussed Hitler with Lord Halifax, and he rendered strong support to Chamberlain at the time of the Munich conference. He emphasized that no important section of the British population opposed Chamberlain’s trip to Munich. [3]

Arnold Toynbee, a leading English historian and an expert on international affairs, had visited Hitler in March 1936. He returned to England with a clear impression of Hitler’s ideas. He informed Conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin that Adolf Hitler was a sincere advocate of peace and close friendship between Great Britain and Germany. [4]

Thomas Jones, the closest friend of Lloyd George and Stanley Baldwin, had excellent connections with British statesmen. He was with Hitler in Munich on May 17, 1936. Jones was on close terms with Ribbentrop, and he was fully informed about Hitler’s attitudes. Hitler had said that if an Anglo-German understanding was achieved, “my biggest life’s desire will be accomplished.” Jones promised Hitler in Munich that Great Britain hoped “to get alongside Germany,” and he praised Hitler’s decision to give the English language priority after German, in German schools, as a significant contribution to future contacts between the two nations. [5]

[1] G.A. Deborin, Vtoraya Mirovaya Voyna, Moscow, 1958, pp. 15-38

[2] Fritz Hesse, Das Spiel um Deutschland, 1953, pp. 14-15. An excellent reference to Hitler’s single-minded desire for friendship and collaboration with Great Britain is Walter Ansel, Hitler Confronts England, Durham N.C. 1960, pp. 10-13.

[3] Raymond Postage, The Life of George Lansbury, London, 1951, pp. 313-317

[4] Thomas Jones, A Diary with Letters, 1931-1950, London, 1954, pp. 180-181.

[5] Ibid., pp. 197-200.


Greatest Story Never Told

ADOLF HITLER: The Greatest Story Never Told

I just ordered the DVD set from Truth Will Out Films

I have never watched any part of the film yet, so I will be looking forward to viewing in.



Odal Rune

The Odal Rune of the Elder Futhark had a basic meaning in the physical sense of – landholding, inheritance, deriving from Nordic mythology, with connections to Gothic, Latin and Greek alphabets, which some believe originate around the Black Sea and Byzantine Greece, its corresponding Greek letter being Omega Ω, the last letter in the Greek alphabet, meaning ‘Great’. The Odal rune was used as a symbol of the Blut und Boden Ideology or “Blood and Soil.” It was representative of the mystical bond between the land and the soul of a folk, the concept of ‘Homeland’ or ‘Fatherland’ or ‘Motherland,’ a specific region of land and water which gives Genesis to a people, gives birth to them and provides for them a prime source of nourishment both physical and spiritual.

The Odal Rune was specifically used by the Reichsbauernshaft, meaning; ‘local farmers’ of the Reich. The most significant focus of the Third Reich’s agricultural structure was independent, privately owned, traditional family run farms. The Reichserbhofgesetz was a remarkable set of laws designed to protect family owned and run German productive farmlands. In September, 1933, the government of Germany introduced Reichserbhofgesetz, which removed farmland from the status of  a transferable”economic goods.” The farmland was instead seen as a family heirloom, a generational possession, a lasting possession of a family and its descendants. The Third Reich actively sought to than protect the family in possession of the property, and also vow to uphold the bond between the family and the farm. There is no other example I can think of in history, of a State authority undertaking such a socio-economic initiative and implementing it as State Law, it is basically anti-State, it is unprecedented as far as I know, and of course all modern State laws whether Capitalist or Communist are contrary to the hereditary farm laws of the Third Reich. The hereditary farm law, declares that all farms which are at least large enough to support a family, depending on the quality and nature of the land’s production, and which do not exceed 125 hectares are hereditary farms or Erbhofe. Smaller properties could become Erbhofe through combination, and larger ones over 125 hectares could become Erbhofe through subdivision or by special permission. According to the laws of the Third Reich the Erbhof cannot be mortgaged to a bank or anybody else inside or outside Germany, nor can either it or necessary equipment be seized for an existing debt. The National Socialists in that respect of their law declared a national ‘Jubilee’ for all privately owned German farms. From 1933 onwards the Third Reich undertook to return all mortgaged Land Titles to the original owners and cancel any debt obligations linked to German farmlands. Such measures have only been written about in mythology, no government has ever performed a Jubilee for the benefits of a national people, never, except the National Socialists, this they did, what was only once regarded as myth was actually achieved by the Third Reich in 1933.

In addition Erbhof  had to obtain permission to sell a private farmland. At death or retirement of the owner or owners, the farm was not to be sold but to be pass on undivided to a single heir, usually the first son. The lines of law regarding farm inheritance were stipulated at length, the testator had a significant amount of choice, for example according to traditional customs of the local area and the ability of the descendants to carry on work and production of the farm. The ideology behind these laws are clear – to protect and develop; “the mystical bond between the land and the soul of the folk.” The rural inheritance law was acknowledged by Hitler to be only an interval measure to prevent the “never-ending process of division among heirs,” “In Britain they have the sound law that the eldest son of a peer can inherit the title; in our country we have nobles by the score, who cannot make a living and will not die.” The Führer in 1941 also noted that it would be reformed; “Whereas the present law of rural inheritance dispossess the younger sons, in the future every peasants’ son will be sure of having his patch of ground.” (p.15 Hitler’s Table Talk.) Meaning Agrarian land would be acquired by a Greater Germania including Eastern lands won via conquest.

National Socialist theorist and Zeppelin pilot Ernst August Lehmann channels the Odal Rune when he writes:

“We recognize that separating man from nature, from the whole of life, leads to mankind’s own destruction and to the death of nations. Only through a reintegration of mankind into the whole of nature can our people be made stronger. That is the fundamental point of the biological tasks of our age. Mankind alone is no longer the focus of thought, but rather life as a whole…This striving toward connectedness with the totality of life, with nature itself, a nature into which we are born, this is the deepest meaning and true essence of National Socialist thought.”  –   Ernst Lehmann. 1934

Make note of that and contemplate this as an anti-humanist, anti-urbanist, anti-industrialist idea, as the very root of the Blood and Soil ideology whose radical base is symbolized by the Odal Rune! 

 Now we search, as has been done before, for a strong communal bond, in an alienating, confused, endlessly divisive Zion that we have been imprisoned in. We rise above these constraints as Wandervogel “wandering free spirits” united only by our rootless, landless state. From ghostly vapours we must reintegrate, and compose a form, a Geo-Genesis, for we have been separated from our source, from our nature, from our land; blood and soil must mix again, bonded as one fertile essence! With the Odal Rune we shall return, again, to dwelling places as a New Race re-born.

So much of the romantic Wandervogel sentiment can be identified with Hitler’s youthful years; the hostility to the pure rationalism, the radical revolutionary spirit, anti-Semitism, anti-urbanism; the search for a place in which to dwell, to be immersed in nature, the communal impulse towards a Folk united in Destiny, the search for the place of origin! Hitler came to represent more than anything, as Ezra Pound said “Man over Machine,” the triumph of Aryan Man over sterile, lifeless industrial advance, man as part of nature rather than man separated and against nature.

“When people attempt to rebel against the iron logic of nature, they come into conflict with the very same principles to which they owe their existence as human beings. Their actions against nature must lead to their own downfall.”  –   Mein Kampf

“Today we see the steady stream from the countryside to the city, deadly for the Volk. The cities swell ever larger unnerving the Volk and destroying the threads which bind mankind to nature; they attract adventurers and profiteers of all colours, thereby fostering racial chaos.”  –   The Myth of The Twentieth Century. Alfred Rosenberg

The first nature reserves in Europe were established by the National Socialists, in particular by Rudolf Hess. From 1933 onwards a wide range of unprecedented environmental reforms were approved and implemented. These reforms and legislation included; reforestation programs, animal and plant protective orders, preservationist decrees blocking industrial development, protection of wildlife habitat, etc. The concept that the National Socialists embarked on a rapid un-restrained modern industrialization plan for Germany is false, no basis whatsoever! Even large-scale construction projects like the Autobahns were constructed in an ecologically sensitive manner using predominately man and horse power and vernacular building methods.

The reichsnaturschutzgesetz of 1935 is another European first. The “Nature Protection Law” established guidelines for preservation of flora and fauna, and “natural monuments” across the Reich; it categorically restricted commercial and industrial access to remaining tracts of significant wilderness. This all-encompassing legislation “required all national, state and local officials to consult and work with Naturschuts authorities before and during any undertaking that would impact on the natural environment of the country. The Reich’s Naturschuts was hailed as a great success by the public and the NS authorities. Of course later, post 1939, with the Allied declarations of war, Operation Barbarossa and bombing campaigns leading to “Total War,” environmental concerns were given much less attention, if any at all.

National Socialism was born from the fertile ground of the Volkisch movement which had its beginning in the mid to late 19th Century and reaching a high pitch in 1920’s Germany. The many Volkisch organizations acted as feeder channels into the politically orientated National Socialist movement. The Volkisch movement regarded unrestrained materialist consumerism, urbanism, empirical science, parliamentarism, democracy, semitic influence, etc, as artificial and damaging for both people and environment. The “Greens” movements of today are only some deformed vestiges of what was the Germanic Volkisch movement, and National Socialist Party. The Volkisch rebelled against the Weimar democracy which it viewed as a cynical puppet government controlled by Jewish dominated international banks and foreign western democracies such as Britain and America, which themselves were only cynical puppet governments serving international private banking interests.

The idealistic and romantic German Nationalists of the Volkisch movement was a cradle of support for National Socialist ideology and politics. Urbanization, destruction of the countryside by commercial and often foreign industry, debt fuelled growth, financial speculation, cultural degeneration, unclean living habits, consumerist culture, rampant materialism, etc, were all viewed by the Volkisch movement and early NSDAP as having a common root in Semitic Monotheism and Masonic Internationalism. They condemned both Capitalism and Communism along with egalitarian world Democracy and liberal industrialized exploitation of natural resources, such condemnations would have a profound influence on the National Socialists and in particular SS ideology as well as Goebbels’ Blut und Boden movement.

From it’s very inception the Volkisch movement demanded the disemancipation of  German Jews and the banning of all sexual relations between those of “Semitic Race” and those considered “Aryan Race.” In 1881 these demands were formalized as a political program and submitted to the German government, the petition had 1 million plus signatures! Which gives a clear example of the vitality and strength and popularity of the Volkisch movement in 1881.

What was epitomized in the Volkisch movement was symbolized in the Odal Rune, like the SS who later inherited the symbol, representing the bonds of kinship and family that tie together those of the same racial blood concentrated in a land of origin – Ur. The Odal Rune was an emblem of Himmler’s RuSHA – Race and Resettlement Office, and Ahnenerbe.

 The Waffen SS Prinz Eugen Division used the Odal Rune as their insignia. The 7th SS-Freiwilligen Gebirgs Division “Prinz Eugen”, the 7th SS Volunteer Mountain Division, named after Prinz Eugen (Prince Eugene) of Savoy-Carignan, a military commander of the Austrian Hapsburg Empire. The Division was formed between April and October 1942 from Volksdeusche (ethnic Germans) in Serbia and Croatia as well as volunteers from Serbia, Croatia, Italy, Romania and Hungary. By December 31, 1942, the division had recruited 21,102 men; 393 officer, 2,010 NCO’s, 18,699 troops. The officers and NCO’s were national Germans (Reichsdeutsche), whereas the enlisted men were recruited from outside the Reich and were considered to be Volksdeutsche, ethnic Germans. Only the German officers and NCOs were entitled to wear the SS Rune, the enlisted personnel were forbidden wearing the SS runes on the collar insignia by orders of the Reichsfuhrer Himmler. Enlisted men however were authorized to wear the Odal rune symbolizing kinship. In addition, all Waffen SS personal serving with the Mountain units were entitled to wear the Edelweiss SS patch. German officers of Prinz Eugen had the option of wearing the Odal rune and many chose to display the Odal as well as their SS runes. From Yugoslavia in total 42,000 men were recruited into 4 divisions for Himmler’s SS. In Yugoslavia the ethnic German population numbered several hundred thousand. The Waffen SS eagerly sought to recruit Croats. Croatia had been a multi-ethnic Kingdom from the 11th Century to the end of WWI, being part of past empires such as the Hungarian Kingdom, the Hapsburg Monarchy, Austria-Hungary and the Venetians. The Kingdom of Croatia had been the main defensive border in the wars against the Ottoman Turks. In 1529 the Ottoman army overcame the Croatian defences and took inland Croatia. In 1683 the Grand Vizier Kara Mustafa advanced on Vienna with large mercenary and conscripted army from bases in Croatia and Bosnia-Hercegovina to lay siege to Vienna, the Capital of the Holy Roman Empire. Prince Eugene of the Italian House of Savoy was made a colonel of a cavalry regiment and distinguished himself in battle. On September 12,  16,000 Polish led by King John Sobieski cavalry charged the Ottoman Turks causing the Turks to retreat. Prince Eugene pursued the retreating Turks to Belgrade where he was wounded in battle at the Seige of Belgrade. The Serbian Peoples of Belgrade rose up and united with the Austrian forces under Prince Eugene in an alliance to liberate Serbia from Ottoman control, the Serbian-Austrian offensive failed in 1690, and Belgrade remained under Turkish rule. The Serbian Patriarch Arsenius Cernoevitch led an exodus of 37,000 Serbian families out of Serbia to settle in lands under Hungarian rule. Prince Eugene continued to battle the Ottoman Turks, he routed the Turks at Zenta in present day Montenegro and then captured Sarajevo. In several battles Eugene defeated the Turkish armies, in 1717 he attacked Belgrade again, declaring “Either I will take Belgrade or the Turks will take me.” On August 15 Prince Eugene destroyed a Turkish relief army and claimed Belgrade for the Austrian Hapsburg Empire under Charles VI. The ethnic German population settled in Croatia during the reign of Austrian archduchess and queen of Hungary and Bohemia, Maria Theresa, who ruled from 1740 to 1780. The Volksdeutsche were originally from the Black Forest region of Swabia, the German settlers were farmers who cleared and cultivated the land that Prince Eugene had driven the Ottoman Turks from.

Himmler talking to the Prinz Eugen Waffen SS

The “Prinz Eugen” SS Division under control of the 12th German Army was formed by Himmler to seek and destroy the Yugoslav guerilla groups, which consisted of two major groups, the royalist ‘Free Yugoslavia Army’ known as Chetnici (Chetniks) and the Soviet backed communist partisans (the British also supported the Tito’s communists) led by “Tito” (Josip Broz).  Both leaders; of the Chetniks General Draza Mihailovich and Tito, had 100,000 gold Reichsmark prices on their heads, dead or alive, a huge sum, obviously Hitler and Himmler had a particular disliking for them. Tito’s Partisans and the Serb Chetniks royalists fought each other when they were not running from the Waffen SS, they hated each other more than they hated the Waffen SS. Tito’s tactics were to evade the Waffen SS and knock out the Chetniks, until Red Army troops arrived in sufficient number. Both these armed guerilla groups were originally made up mainly from ethnic Serbs, but included in their ranks, Croats, Slovenes, and Jews and Muslims or any man that had an interest royalist power in the Balkans or communist power. In typical Balkan war fashion all sides were a mixed lot of colours and creeds. Prinz Eugen Division was also to claim the arms of Italian units that were in the process of surrender to the Allies, and bolster and support any the Croatian Ustashe military and police. The Prinz Eugen Division was poorly equipped for its battles in the field, with little German weaponry provided, the unit used captured equipment such as Czech machine guns and French tanks to begin with. However it must be noted that because of the difficulty of the terrain that the division had to cover, light weaponry would have been preferred and what they were equipped with was superior to the Partisans or Chetniks. After a series of battles in the Balkans with Partisan forces and Serb Chetniks, the Division was reorganized with the addition of the “13 Waffen Gerbirgs-Division des SS Handshar,” the “23 Waffen Gerbirgs Division der SS Kama” (made up of Bosnian Muslims) and the “21 Waffen Gerbirgs der SS Skandenberg” (made up of Kosovo Albanians). The Bosniak Muslim units had not acted in a full divisional level and SS Kama had not seen action at all and was plagued with defections. Himmler with the assistance of the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem had formed the Bosniak Muslim divisions, considering them to be ethnic Croats whose ancestors had fought for the Austro-Hungarian Hapsburgs against the Ottoman Turks. The Kosovo Albanians had been known for their long struggles against the Ottoman Empire. The re-organized Division then saw action in what would be its most important role of the war, receiving orders to hold a strategic bridgehead in the Vardar Corridor in Macedonia to allow for the evacuation of 350,000 German soldiers who faced being encircled by a huge Soviet army advancing towards them. The 350,000 German soldiers were retreating North from the Aegean and Greek regions of the Balkans. Although almost being overcome and suffering heavy losses the Prinz Eugen Division managed to hold the critical bridgehead in the Vardar Corridor helping to make it possible for the main troop of German soldiers to successfully retreat through.

Prinz Eugen Division arrive in Mostar

On 20th October 1944 the Soviets captured Belgrade and Prinz Eugen was still rear-guarding the German retreat under heavy fire. Heavy casualties took their toll and divisional SS Kavallerie-Abteilung 7 was disbanded, and then in early November the “SS Skanderberg” division was disbanded. In January 1945 the remaining Prinz Eugen Division fought the partisans near Otok and later they were sent to Vukovar where the unit fought more retreating battles against the advancing Soviets as well as Tito’s partisans. The Prinz Eugen fought on under heavy assault from Partisans and the Soviet army. They held a position near Karlovac on the 2 May 1945, their end coming a week later in Celje, Slovenia where the tattered remnants of the Prinz Eugen Division finally surrendered to Soviet backed Yugoslav forces.

My father is from the island of Korcula in the Adriatic off the coast of Croatia, and remembers when the Waffen SS Prinz Eugen Division swept through the islands in an attempt to re-gain control from the communist partisans. The inhabitants of Korcula traditionally call themselves “Dalmatians.” The island is said to have been originally settled by the Trojans, whereas the Croats came from the Alps mountain areas with Slavic migrations. Korcula has always been a sea-faring island with a deep water port, and known for its sea-trading activities and boat building. Korcula was part of the Venetian Republic, local legend has it that Marco Polo was born on the island of Korcula. It was Korcula’s timber that built the wooden walls of Venice and help build the Venetian fleet. Later Korcula came under Hapsburg rule of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

The Odal Rune has now travelled from Nordic Poetry to the Geist of Volkische revolutionaries to the peasant farmlands of Germany, to the NSDAP Blut und Boden movement and Third Reich property laws, to the SS ideology on noble race, kinship and ancestral lineage, and then to the multi-ethnic Waffen SS Mountain Divisions of anti-Partisan fighters in the Balkans. The energy composed in the Runes, like all energy, is in a process of change, a constant state of transformation. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be transferred. Over the last few decades the Odal Rune has been adopted by some nationalist movements, most notably the Afrikaner and Boer groups in South Africa, and more recently Neo-pagans and Neo-folk movements for example; Asatru and Wotanism and Odinism. This I see as a retrograde movement of the runic energy and a re-setting of the Odal Rune to its pre-National Socialist incarnation, and this appears to be a necessary cycle, the majority of those now employing the Odal Rune have no comprehension of National Socialism, and maybe they need to go through this cycle again, as in retrograde motion. The path of Odal Rune itself is retrograde, as it follows the path of a lozenge, crossing near its base before rising in a forward motion again. The path of truth is crooked and crossed. For the Aryanists of today, the Odal Rune represents the search for a homeland, rather than an existing connection to a homeland. The homelands of the past are dead as the nations are dead, only the deeds of the Aryan Dead remain eternal. Aryanism must search for a land of source again, we seek, we scour, we probe, we sift through, we distill, we explore, scrutinize, survey, investigate, examine, in our quest for a place to dwell.

“The Phoney War”

The British Expeditionary Force was formalized in 1938, in preparation for a full-scale military take-over of Germany by the Allied forces, just as in the previous world war, Britain and France declared war on Germany without any verifiable threat to their own borders. In 1939 British and French troops begin to amass along the Maginot line separating Belgium and France, and France and Germany, the excuse for the military buildup is “annexed Austria”, other blockades & sanctions are placed on Germany in breach of international law, and countless other incitements of war. On March, 13th, 1938, the people of Austria and Germany voted democratically on the re-unification of Austria with Germany, the result was 99.3% of votes in favour of the re-unification of Austria and Germany, less than 1% of all German and Austrian voters voted against the re-unification of Austria and Germany. This democratic referendum is the only excuse given by Britain and France as to the reason why they would be amassing hundreds of thousands of troops and manning battle stations along the Maginot line. For over three months materials, supplies, vehicles, armoured divisions and more troops continued to arrive, by 13 March 1940 the British Expeditionary Force numbered 316,000 men, and by May 1940 there were ten infantry divisions, the 1st Army Tank Brigade, the BEF Air Component RAF detachment consisting of approx. 500 aircraft and the Advanced Air Striking Force (AASF) long-range RAF force. These forces were led by General Headquarters (GHQ) consisting of  Headquarter troops (1st Battalion Welsh Guards, 9th Battalion The West Yorkshire Regiment and the 14th Battalion The Royal Fusiliers), the 1st Army Tank Brigade, 1st Light Armoured Reconnaissance Brigade and the HQ Royal Artillery 5th Infantry Division.

On the 10th May 1940 these military forces were joined by the 52nd (Lowland) Infantry Division and the 1st Canadian Infantry Brigade, and then on 13 June 1940, the formation of military British Expeditionary Force was joined by the ‘Norman Force’ comprised of the 3rd Armoured Brigade, 157th infantry Brigade, 71st Field Regiment R.A., and Troop Carry Company, 52nd Division.

This phase of early World War II is named “The Phoney War”, which is an apt name, it was indeed a phoney war, in the sense that it was fabricated by the Allies as a pretense to invade and destroy Germany. The British Expeditionary Force was formalized in March 1938, after the re-unification of Austria and Germany, which was a democratic referendum. The British Expeditionary Force was deployed and the Invasion of Germany begun on 3 September 1939, this was the day when Britain declared war on Germany….again, Britain declared war on Germany!

Part of the “Phoney War” conducted by the Allies was the “Invasion of Poland”, just like “annexed Austria”, the Allies used this phoney war propaganda to justify to their own ignorant citizens that Germany needed to be attacked and literally destroyed, along with any sovereign states that allied themselves with Germany or even neutral! In fact Britain was even willing to attack and kill her own allies and did so to the French! The “Invasion of Poland” by Germany which was trumpeted from the Parliament floors and Newspaper stands, was not in reality an “Invasion” perpetrated against Poland, it was the defense and prevention of further Genocide of German minorities in Poland by Polish majorities, and an acknowledgement of repeated threats and provocations.

The slaughter and genocide of 10,000’s of Germans in Poland, also freezing of German assets, destruction of German property, theft of German property, the forced mass ejection of 100,000’s of Germans from what was their own native land, and most disturbingly the torture and mutilation of  German folk of all ages for no reason other than they were German. This is all recorded, photographically documented, publically stated and established fact beyond doubt, the Polish atrocities committed against Germans and the provocation, incitement and sabre-rattling against Germany by the Polish nation are all historical fact. There were reported incidents of crimes against German minorities in Poland stretching back to the end of WWI, crimes that were recorded and reported by German authorities to the League of Nations, yet there was no action taken by the League of Nations, which is a total neglect of the duties they are supposed to be established for.

Germany’s actions were for the defence and prevention of further genocide of Germans by Poles in Poland, and the German State would not be a State unless it upholds the right to defend its own people within and without their own borders, Germany was in fact legally obligated to defend her people in Poland, required to do so for the prevention of the genocide of German people, by a another newly formed State assembled from the injustices of the Treaty of Versailles! A State that had repeatedly and without any justification other than racial hatred systematically and publically slaughtered , tortured, burned, mutilated and murdered, tens of thousands of ethnic Germans, on what was their own native land! And this is the reason that Britain gave as proof that Germany should be completely destroyed and all ethnic racial Germans killed in a bloody second World War, by any means possible. What kind of madness is that?

Clearly the act of war mongering, Britain’s ‘Phoney War’ behalf is utterly contemptible, instead of protecting the sovereignty of Poland, a deliberate cynical lie and propaganda cover was fabricated, it was indeed rather a full-scale military commitment to destroy the Reich of Germany and genocide all within her borders and without, an act that was already being gruesomely carried out by the Polish State. The fact that Russia also attacked Poland seemed not an issue to the British, and the question that would be asked is, why? Well, I would not expect a straight answer but conclude that Britain was not actually interested at all in the sovereignty of Poland, seeming that Russia had invaded from the East to take Poland, without a whimper from Britain, it is clear to see that Britain would have had to declare war on Russia, for genuine interest to have been present on their part, but no, it was never Britain’s intention to protect the Polish people or their State, the British intention was as it was in WWI –  declare war on Germany and embark on a full-scale military conquest of Germany by any means possible whatever the cost. And the reason for this was that Britain at that time was the main proxy armed force for the International Banking Elite and World Jewry, that is all Britain was in 1939, they are less than that today of course, as America has now dutifully taken over that role as robotic police enforcer and mindless mercenary armies for private Jewish Banking Interests.

Let us now read from the Speech made by the Führer and Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler at the Langer Market in Danzig on Tuesday, September 19, 1939.

“My Gauleier! My dear fellow-countrymen and fellow country-women of Danzig!

You are not alone in experiencing this moment with the deepest emotion; the whole German nation is experiencing it too. I myself am conscious of the greatness of this hour. For the first time I am treading upon soil of which German settlers had taken possession five hundred years before the first white men settled in what is today New York State. It is thus five hundred years longer that this soil was German. had remained German and will of this we may all be convinced – remain German.

The fate which this town and this beautiful country have experienced has been a fate of the whole of Germany. The World War, the most senseless struggle of all time, numbers this country and this town among its victims, the World War which brought losses to all and gains to none, the World War which after it’s close must have left every one of us firmly convinced that a similar fate should never overtake us again, and which unfortunately today appears to have been forgotten by the very people who at the time were the main inciters to war and probably also the parties chiefly interested in that universal slaughter. When the murderous conflict of those days, into which Germany entered without any aims of war, came to an end, humanity was to be assured a peace which would lead to a rebirth of justice and thereby to a final abolition of all distress. At Versailles this peace was not put before our nation as a matter for free negotiation, but was forced upon us as a brutal dictate. The progenitors of this peace visualized in it the end of the German nation. There may have been many people who believed that this peace would mean the end of all distress, yet it was only the beginning of new entanglements. There was however one point where those who instigated and ended that war were mistaken. By their peace they did not succeed in solving a single problem, but only created countless new ones. It was only a question of time until the German nation, which they had trampled underfoot, would rise up again in order to find, of its own accord, a solution for the problems which had been forced on it. For the essential problem was completely overlooked in those days, namely, the fact that nations happen to exist, irrespective of whether this may suit the war-mongers. The grossest injustice was done to Germany by the treaty of Versailles. If a statesman of another nation considers himself justified in declaring today that he has no confidence in the word of German statesmen and of the German nation, than we Germans have the right to reply that we lack all confidence in the assurances of those who at that time so miserable broke their most solemn promises.

I do not intend to speak about the injustices of Versailles. Perhaps the worst thing in the lives of the nations is not so much the injustice, but the senselessness, the folly, and utter stupidity with which in those days a peace was imposed upon the world, that completely disregarded all historical, economic, national and political facts. Regulations were arrived at which actually force one to doubt whether the men who perpetrated them were really in their right mind. Devoid of all knowledge of the historical development of these districts, devoid even of all economic understanding, these people juggled about with Europe, tore States apart, divided up countries, suppressed and handed over nations, destroyed culture.

This land too, was a victim of that madness and the Polish State itself a product of this folly. What Germany had to sacrifice for this Polish State the world probably does not know. One thing only I should like to declare here: The development of all the territories which were at that time incorporated into Poland is entirely due to German energy, German industry, and German creative work. They owe their cultural importance exclusively to the German nation.

At that time the pretext for rendering more than a whole province from the Reich and for allocating it to this new Polish State was that it was a matter of racial necessity. Actually the plebiscite held at a later date showed in every case that nobody really had any desire to be incorporated in this Polish State. This same Poland which owes its existence to the supreme sacrifice of countless German regiments, expanded, without regard for reason or economic considerations, at the expense of territory in which Germans had settled centuries ago. One thing has been clearly proved during the last twenty years. The Poles, who are responsible for the introduction of this culture, were not even able to preserve it. It has become evident once more that only those who are themselves gifted with creative power are capable of sustained and genuine cultural achievement. Another fifty years of Polish rule would have sufficed to reduce once more to barbarism these districts which Germans by their painstaking efforts and zeal had redeemed from a state of savagery. Symptoms of such a relapse and decay were already apparent everywhere.

Yet Poland herself was a State composed of various nationalities; the very thing was created which had been regarded as a primary fault of the old Austrian State.

Actually, Poland herself was never a democracy. An infinitesimal, degenerate upper class ruled not only over foreign nationalities, but also over what they called their own people. It was a State ruled by brute force, by the police and, as a last resort, also by the army. The lot of the Germans in this country was terrible. There is a considerable difference whether a people of inferior cultural importance has the misfortune of being ruled over by culturally superiors or whether a people with higher cultural standards has to endure the tragic fate of having to submit to a rule of violence inflicted by an inferior people, for this inferior people will develop all kinds of inferiority complexes and the reaction will make them turn against the superior and cultured people whom they will cruelly and barbarously ill-treat. The Germans have had to endure this fate for close to twenty years.

There is no need for me to describe in detail the lot of the Germans. It was, as I have already emphasized, both tragic and deplorable. Nevertheless, here as in every other instance I tried to reach a settlement which might have led to an equitable compromise. I once did my best to achieve a final settlement of the frontiers, first in the West and later in the South of the Reich, to eliminate the element of danger in the provinces concerned and to secure peace in the future. I did my utmost to achieve the same here. At that time there was in Poland a man whose insight and energy were incontestable. I succeeded in coming to an agreement with the late Marshall Pilsudski, which was intended to pave the way towards a peaceful understanding between two nations, an agreement which, from the outset, did not sanction anything that was created by the Treaty of Versailles, but which endeavored to lay at least the foundations for a reasonable and tolerable side-by-side existence by completely ignoring that treaty.

As long as the Marshall was alive it seemed as if this attempt might indeed lead to an improvement of the tense situation. Immediately after his death, however, an intensified anti-German campaign began. This campaign, which took numerous and varied forms, embittered and complicated the relations between the two nations in an increasing degree. In the long run it was extremely difficult to look on patiently while in a neighbouring country, whose very existence had caused grevous harm to Germany, the German minorities were being persecuted in the most barbarous way. The world, ready to shed tears whenever a Polish Jew who immigrated to Germany only a comparatively short time ago is turned out – this same world remained absolutely deaf to the sufferings of those who, in compliance with the Treaty of Versailles, were forced to leave their native land not by the thousand but by the million. The world was deaf for the simple reason that they were Germans.

The fact, which for all of us was not only depressing, but at the same time infuriating, was that we had to submit to all this at the hands of a State which was vastly inferior to us. After all Germany was undeniably a Great Power, even though a few madmen believed that they could abolish the vital rights of a great nation by means of an insane enforced treaty.

How could a Great Power like Germany be expected to look on how a much inferior people and much inferior State maltreated Germans in these territories? Two conditions in particular were quite unbearable. Firstly, a city, whose German character could not be contested by anyone, was not only prevented from finding its way back to the Reich, but an attempt was also made to colonize it systematically and gradually by a thousand means and ways. Secondly, communication with a province separated from the German Reich was interfered with by all kinds of petty chicanery or made dependent on the benevolent attitude of the Polish State. No other power in the world would have put up with such conditions for so long a time as Germany did. I cannot imagine what England for instance would have said to a similar solution, purporting to establish peace at her expense, of how France or the United States of America would have accepted such a solution.

I tried to find ways and means for a bearable solution of this problem also. These endeavours I submitted verbally to the former Polish rulers. With these proposals you are all familiar, they were more than reasonable. I attempted to arrive at an understanding doing  justice to our desire to re-establish a connection between East Prussia and the Reich, on the one hand, and the economic demands of the Poles, on the other. I consider myself justified in saying that at the time I was more than modest. There were moments when I reflected and asked myself over and over again whether before my own people I could take such a responsibility of submitting such proposals for a solution to the Polish Government. My only reason for doing so was that I was anxious to spare both the German Reich and the Polish people the sufferings resulting from another conflict.

During the course of this spring I have again repeated this offer in the most concrete form.

Danzig was to return to the Reich. An exterritorial road was to be built to East Prussia – at our expense of course. In return Poland was to receive the most extensive Free Port rights, and similar exterritorial access. I, on the other hand, on top of that, was prepared to guarantee the existing frontiers, hardly bearable as they were, and finally to let Poland participate in guaranteeing the safety of Slovakia. I cannot imagine what a state of mind the Polish Government was in when it rejected these proposals. I do know, however, that untold millions of Germans gave a sigh of relief because they were of the opinion that in making those proposals I had gone to far.

Poland’s reply was to order the first mobilization, immediately followed by ferocious terrorism. My request to the then Polish foreign Minister to visit me in Berlin in order to discuss this question with me was once more rejected, instead of coming to Berlin, he went to London!

There followed those weeks and months of ever-increasing threats, threats hard to bear for a small State, but absolutely unbearable in the long run for any Great Power. In Polish newspapers we could read that Danzig was not the problem, but rather East Prussia, and that Poland should annex East Prussia before long. These threats finally went into extremes. Other Polish papers declared that even East Prussia meant no solution of the problem, but that the Pomerania too ought under all circumstances to become part of Poland, and finally it was declared doubtful whether Oder would do as a boundary because in reality the natural Polish boundary was not the Oder but the Elbe! The only thing about which people racked their brains was whether our army was to be torn to shreds this side or the other side of Berlin. A Polish general who has now miserably left his army in the lurch, declared that he would hack Germany and German army to pieces.

Simultaneously a veritable martyrdom began for our German brothers in Poland. Tens of thousands of them were brutally driven away, maltreated or put to death in the cruelest manner; sadistic maniacs gave way to their perverse instincts, and the pious democratic world looked on calmly without raising a finger.

I have often asked myself the question: Who could have blinded Poland? Did they really think that the German nation would for any length of time tolerate such behaviour on the part of so ludicrous a State? Evidently it was believed, because from a certain quarter the Poles were told that it might be possible; from the same quarter where the chief war-mongers have sat not just for the last twenty years or so, but for hundreds of years, and where they still sit today. It was stated by them in that Germany was negligible as a power; they made Poles believe that they would not have the slightest difficulty in opposing Germany, they actually went one step further: the Poles were finally given the assurance that if their own power of resistance was not strong enough, they might at any time count on the resistance, that is assistance of another party. They gave that marvelous guarantee which empowered a meglomaniac small State to start a war or, alternatively, not to start one.

To these men, indeed, Poland was only a means to an end. For today they admit quite frankly that they were not primarily concerned with Poland but with the German regime. I always warned you of these men. You will remember my speeches at Saabrucken and at Wilhelmshaven. In both these speeches, I have pointed to the dangers which must arise when, in a country in which one can never be certain whether these men will not shortly enter the government. I was told at the time that would never be the case.

In my opinion they are the government now. So what I foresaw then has come true. At that time, I decided to warn the German nation for the first time of these men, and to leave no doubt that Germany would under no circumstances capitulate again before their threats and not even before the brute force of these men.

The answer of mine was most fiercely attacked in those days. For a certain practice has gradually developed in these democracies, which consists in war-mongering being permitted in democracies. Foreign regimes, foreign statesman, and foreign heads of State may be attacked, maligned, insulted and vilified, because freedom of speech and of the press prevails there. In totalitarian States, on the other hand, one is not allowed to defend oneself, for their discipline prevails. It follows therefore that the war-mongering is only permissible in undisciplined States, while in disciplined States no answer may be given. In practice, this would lead to the nations in undisciplined States being incited to war, whereas in so-called disciplined States the nations have no notion of what is happening. I therefore resolved to inform the German nation gradually of the machinations of this criminal clique and I thus gradually awoke in them the German nation that defensive attitude of mind which I considered necessary, lest it should one day be taken by surprise.

By September the situation had become untenable. You are familiar with the developments of those days in August. I still believe that without the British guarantee and the agitation of the war-mongers it would have been possible during last August to arrive at an understanding. There was a certain moment when England herself tried to arrange for direct discussions between ourselves and Poland, for which I was quite prepared; the Poles, however, failed to turn up. For two whole days I and my Government waited in vain in Berlin. In the meantime I had worked out a new proposition, which is known to you. On the evening of the first day I had communicated to the British Ambassador in Berlin, to whom it was read sentence for sentence, additional comment being given by the Foreign Minister. The next day came and nothing happened, except for the Polish general mobilization, fresh acts of terror and countless attacks upon Reich territory.

In the life of the peoples, too, patience should not always be mistaken for weakness. With unbounded patience I have waited for years and years watched these continuous provocations. Only few people can really judge of what I suffered during this long time, when hardly a month passed, nay, hardly a week, during which not one or the other deputation came to me from these territories, describing to me the unbearable situation of the Germans and imploring me again and again to intervene. I have always asked them to try just once more. This went on year after year. But in recent times I occasionally expressed a warning to the effect that some day an end must be put to this state of affairs; and now after months and months of waiting and fresh proposals, I finally decided – as I already said before the Reichstag – to talk to Poland in exactly the same language in which the Poles considered themselves entitled to talk to us, that is to say, the only language which they, apparently, are able to understand.

Even at that moment peace might still once more have been saved. Our friend Italy, that is to say the Duce, intervened and made a proposal for the adjustment of the questions at issue. France agreed, and I, too, expressed my consent. Great Britain again rejected this proposal and instead believed herself entitled to present the German Reich with an ultimatum limited to two hours and containing an impossible demand. The British were labouring under one great misapprehension: in November 1918 there was a German Government “kept” by them, and they are mistaking the present German regime for the one “kept” by them, and the present German nation with the then misled and deluded German people. Present day Germany refuses to be offered any ultimatums, of which we would have London take notice!

During the last six years we had to put up with unheard-of things from States like Poland, yet I never sent any ultimatums. I know that Poland, in choosing war, did so because others instigated her to start a war, that is to say, those others who believed that they might use this war to carry through their biggest world-political and financial transaction. It will not only not be their biggest business transaction, but also their greatest disappointment!

Poland has sown war and reaped war. She has light-heartedly thrown down the gauntlet because certain Western statesmen assured her that they possessed exact information regarding the inefficiency of the German army, the inferiority of its equipment, the poor morale of our troops, the defeatist feeling among the population of the Reich, and the discrepancy alleged to prevail between the German people and their leaders. The Poles had been talked into the belief that it would be an easy matter for them not to resist but also to repulse our armies. And it was upon such advice given to Poland by Western General Staff members that she made her plans for her military operations.

In the meantime, only 18 days have passed, and there is hardly a case in history where the old saying:

“The Lord hath beaten them, –  Horse, man and chariot”

could be applied more aptly.

While I am addressing you here, our troops occupy a line extending from Lemberg to Brest and further to the North, and at this very moment, in fact since yesterday afternoon, endless columns of the beaten Polish army are leaving the Kutno region as prisoners. Yesterday morning they numbered 20,000, last night 50,000, this morning 70,000, and I don’t know what their number is now. One thing, however, I know for certain, whatever formations of the Polish army stand west of that line will capitulate, surrender arms or be annihilated within a few days.

At this moment our grateful hearts turn to our men. The German armed forces have given these talented statesmen, who were so well-informed about conditions in the Reich, the necessary demonstration in kind. Marshall Rydz-Smigly lost his bearings. He was last heard of in Czernowitz instead of Berlin and with him were his whole Government and all the deceivers who drove the Polish people into that act of insanity.

The German soldiers have done their duty to the utmost, on land, at sea and in the air. The German infantry has again shown itself to be the incomparable master of the situation. It’s bravery, its courage and its efficiency have often been aspired to but never equaled. The up-to-date equipment of our mechanized units has proved to be of high excellence. The men of our navy do their duty admirably, while the German air force keeps watch over everything and guards German territory. The people who dreamed of crushing germany and of razing german cities to the ground have grown very silent, because they know perfectly well that for every bomb dropped on a German town five or ten will be returned. But do not let them pretend that they are adopting this method of warfare out of shear humanity! It is out of fear of reprisals.

At this point let us do full justice to the Polish soldiers. The Poles have fought bravely in many places. Their non-commissioned officers did their utmost; their officers lacked intelligence; their supreme command was an absolute failure. Their organization was just Polish.

At this moment, approximately 300,000 Polish soldiers have been taken prisoner; almost 2,000 officers and many generals share the same fate.

But I must also mention that side by side with the acknowledged bravery of many Polish units stand the most loathsome deeds which perhaps have occurred anywhere during the last centuries. Things have happened which I as a soldier in the World War, who only fought on the Western front, never had an opportunity of experiencing.

I am thinking of the thousands of slaughtered Germans, of the bestially butchered women, girls and children, of the countless German soldiers who, when wounded, fell into the hands of the enemy. They were massacred, their eyes were torn out, they were brutally mutilated. And worst of all: the Polish Governor openly admitted by its own broadcasts that the airmen who parachuted to the ground were murdered. There were really moments when the question arose whether under these circumstances it was possible to refrain from taking retaliatory action. I have not learnt that a single democratic statesman went to the trouble of protesting against this barbarity. I gave orders to the German air force to wage this war humanely, that is to say to attack fighting troops only. The Polish government and the supreme command ordered their civilian population to carry this war as snipers firing from hiding places. It was very hard not to lose one’s self-control. But I should like to emphasize here: Let no one in the democratic States imagine that this state of affairs must need continue forever. If they want a change of methods they can have it. Here, too, my patience may come to an end.

despite this treacherous method of making war, which cannot find its equal in the last twenty years or more, our army accounted for this enemy with lightning speed. Still one English paper announced a few days ago that I dismissed a major-general because I had counted upon a lightning war and was bitterly disappointed at the slow progress of our operations!

This article seems to have been penned by the very strategist who gave the Poles strategic advice for the disposition of their armies. Thus we have utterly defeated Poland in barely eighteen days, and by so doing brough about a state of affairs which may perhaps enable us some day to confer reasonably and calmly with the representatives of that nation.

In the meanwhile Russia has on her part found it necessary to march into Poland to safeguard the interest of the White Russian and Ukrainian minorities there. We are now experiencing the phenomenon that England and France look upon this co-operation between Germany and Russia as a monstrous crime. One Englishmen actually described it as perfidy – after all, they ought to know. I suppose England considers this action because Democratic England’s attempt to co-operate with Bolshevist Russia failed, whereas the attempt of National Socialist Germany to co-operate with Bolshevist Russia has now succeeded.

At this point I want to make one thing quite clear: Russia remains what she is and Germany will remain what she is. But both regimes have agreed on one point, namely, that neither the Russian nor the German regime is willing to sacrifice a single man in the interest of the Western democracies. Both these States and both these peoples therefore refuse this offer with thanks. We intend in the future to look after our own interests, and we have discovered that we can best safeguard those interests if the two greatest peoples and States come to an understanding.

That is all the easier since the British assertion regarding the unlimited aims of  German foreign policy is merely a lie. I am glad to be able to prove to the British statesmen the falsity of this statement. Those British statesmen who continually declared that Germany intended to rule Europe as far as the Urals will now be delighted to learn the limits of Germany’s political intentions.

I believe, however, that it will deprive them of another pretext for war, since they declare that the very reason which forced them to fight against the present regime is because that regime was pursuing unlimited war aims.

Well, Gentlemen of the Great British Empire, Germany’s aims are definitely limited. We have discussed the matter with Russia who is after all the neighbor whose interests are most involved. England should therefore actually welcome the fact that an agreement between Germany and Soviet-Russia has been reached, for this agreement at the same time serves to dispel that nightmare about the alleged “world conquest aspirations” of the present German regime which robbed British statesmen of their sleep. They will be relieved to learn that it is not true that Germany either wants today or ever wanted to conquer and Ukraine. Our interests are very limited. Admittedly we are determined to safeguard these interests against any danger and against any aggressor. And the past eighteen days furnish ample proof that we are not prepared to stand any nonsense.

What the final political formation of this big region will finally look like will depend mainly on those two countries whose most vital interests are involved. Germany puts forward limited, but irrevocable demands, and she will realize these demands one way or another. Here, instead of a hotbed of trouble for Europe, Germany and Russia will bring about a situation which later on will be recognized as a relief from the tension. If the Western powers declare that this must not take place, and if England in particular declares that she is determined to oppose such a development, if necessary by a war lasting three, or it may be five or even eight years, the I should like to reply as follows:

Firstly, Germany accepted the final fixing of her frontiers in the West and in the South at a heavy sacrifice, in order thereby to bring about a final lasting peace. We believe that we had succeeded in this and I believe that we should have succeeded had it not been to the interests of certain war-mongers to create a disturbance of the peace in Europe.

I have no warlike intentions against either England or France. Nor has the German nation any such intentions. Since I have been in office I have endeavoured to re-establish gradually closer relations based on mutual confidence, especially with our opponents in the Great War. I endeavored to remove all the tension once existing between Ital and Germany, and I can now state that my efforts met with complete success, and that the relations established between the two countries are steadily becoming closer and more cordial, based as they are on the close personal and friendly relations between the Duce and myself.

I went even further. I endeavored to obtain the same good relationship with France. Immediately after the settlement of the Saar question I solemnly renounced all claims to a revision of the frontier settlement in the west for all time and not merely in theory, but also in practice. I have used the entire German propaganda service for the purpose of making my attitude known and eliminated everything which could possibly have given rise to doubts or anxiety in Paris.

You know my offers to England. I only had the great aim of concluding an honorable friendly relationship with the British nation. If all this has now been turned down and if England today believes that she must wage war against Germany, I should like to answer as follows: Poland will never rise up again in the form given to her by the Treaty of Versailles. For this not only Germany, but also Russia are in the last resort guarantors. If England now seems to be altering her objectives in this war, i.e. is in reality revealing her true objectives, I should to comment on this. It is said in England that this war was naturally waged for Poland, but that this was only a secondary issue; more important is the war against the present regime in Germany. They do me the honor of mentioning me by name as a representative of this regime. If this is their real objective in this war, then I should like to give the following answer to the gentlemen in London: You can do me no greater honor than to think of me in this way.

It was a matter of principal to me to educate the German nation in such a way that every regime which is praised by our enemies is regarded as poisonous and therefore rejected by the German nation. If, therefore, the German regime should meet with the approval of Messrs, Churchill, Duff Copper, Eden, etc, then this regime would at the most be paid by these gentlemen, and thus be intolerable for Germany. This of course cannot apply to us. We may therefore consider it rather an honor to be disapproved of by these gentlemen and I can only assure them of one thing: if they were to praise me it might be a matter of profound grief to me. I am proud to be attacked by them. But if they should think they can thereby alienate the German people from me, they must either consider this people to be as utterly lacking in character or as stupid as they themselves are.

Here they make a twofold mistake. National Socialism has not educated Germans in vain for the last twenty years. All of us are men who have experienced nothing but attacks throughout their long struggle. That has only increased the affection of our supporters and bound us all the more insoluble together.. And just as the National Socialist Party fought that battle for years until victory was theirs, so do National Socialist Germany and the German people take up this fight today. I can assure those gentlemen that their ridiculous propaganda will no longer act as a disintegrating factor among the German people. Those dabblers ought first to take elementary lessons in propaganda from us. If any nations are to be ruined, it will not be the German nation. We are fighting for our rights; we have no desire for the profit and the political interests of a small clique.

And if people say that this war will last three years, then I can only express my sympathy with the French “poliu.” Probably he has no idea what he is fighting for. He simply knows that he will have the honor of fighting for at least three years. As for that, we shall have some say in the matter too.

If  however, it should last three years, there will be no talk of capitulation either in the third or fourth year nor in the fifth, sixth or seventh. Let those gentlemen remember that the generation leading Germany today is not Bethmann-Hollweg’s generation. Today they are faced with a Germany with the spirit of Frederick the Great. The German nation will in no way disintegrate in the course of this fight, but will only be all the more firmly bound together. If anything should disintegrate it will be those states which consist of all kinds of races, like our plutocratic world democracies, the so-called world empires, which are solely based on oppression of suzerainty over other nations.

We are simply fighting for our existence. We do not believe the lies of those foolish propagandists who would make us believe that the war is aimed at a regime. Just imagine anyone saying: A country is ruled by someone who does not suit us; well then, let us go to war and fight for three years! Of course we should never think of fighting ourselves, and we hunt round the world until we find someone who will fight for us. We supply guns and ammunition, and the others supply grenadiers and soldiers, the man-power. What an utter lack of conscience! I wonder what they would say if we had ever declared – The actual regime in France or England does not suit us and therefore we shall start a war!- What an appalling lack of conscience! And for this reason millions of men are driven to their deaths!

But there is one thing about which there cannot be a shadow of a doubt. We shall accept any challenge, and we shall fight as our opponents fight. England is once again resorting to lies and hypocrisy in waging war against women and children. England has a weapon where she believes herself to be unassailable, her naval forces. And now she says: because we cannot be attacked by this weapon, we are justified in using it against the women and children not only of our enemies but even, if necessary, against those of the neutral countries. Once more I would warn them not to be mistaken. The time might come, perhaps very quickly, when we would make use of a weapon by which we cannot be attacked. Let us hope that they will then suddenly remember the laws of humanity and the impossibility of waging war against women and children. We Germans feel no desire to do so; it is not in our nature. In this campaign I have given orders to spare all towns if at all possible. Of course, if a detachment of soldiers crosses a market-place and is attacked from the air this may unfortunately result in a civilian being a victim. As a principal, however, we have kept to this rule of sparing towns, and not a window has been broken in places where no resistance was offered by mad or criminal elements. In a city like Cracow not a single bomb was dropped except the railway station, which is a military objective, and on the aerodrome. If in Warsaw, on the other hand, civilians now engage in fighting in every street and from every house the whole city will be involved as a matter of course. Hitherto we have kept these rules, and we should like to continue to do so.

England has the choice of carrying on the blockade in a way compatible with international law or in violation of it. We shall adapt it ourselves accordingly. Of one thing there can be no doubt. Since England no longer aims at fighting a regime, but fighting the German people, and even German women and children, our reaction will correspond to these aims. One thing will turn out to be certain: Germany will never capitulate.

We know full well what the fate of such a Germany would be. Mr King Hall, commissioned by his lords and masters, has kindly told us that it would take the form of a second Treaty of Versailles, only much worse. Meanwhile we have been favoured with detailed illustrations of what is being planned, of how Germany is to be split up, of how the South German countries are to be severed from the Reich, of what Poland is to be given back, what new States are to be created and which princes are to be crowned etc. The German people take note of all this and will fight accordingly.

Let me take this opportunity of expressing my thanks to the German people. They have indeed given wonderful proof during the past weeks not only of their inner solidarity but of truly great courage. Here too National Socialism has wrought a change. Some may say that the German people are not so enthusiastic as in 1914. They are far more enthusiastic; the difference is that today this enthusiasm is burning within their hearts and makes men hard. It is not a superficial jingo-patriotism that does no more than cheer, it is fervent determination. It is the enthusiasm of men who know war, who have been through a war. They have not entered upon it frivolously, but once forced into it they will fight as did the former German lines.

Just as on my visit to the front lines I saw all those regiments and divisions, young and old alike in the same frame of mind, so I see before me the German people as a whole. We have no need of jingo-patriotism today. We all know how terrible these happenings are. But we are fully determined to bring these happenings to a successful conclusion, come what may. None of us are better than those men and women of the past. The sacrifices they made were no lighter than the sacrifices we have to make today. None of the sacrifices expected of us are any harder than the sacrifices expected in the past.

We are determined, no matter what may happen, to go through with this fight and to hold our own. Our only wish is that God Almighty, who has now blessed our weapons, may enlighten the other nations, giving them the wisdom to recognize the futility of this war, this battle of nations, and that He may let them reflect on the blessings of a peace which they sacrifice simply because of a handful of infernal war-mongers and war-profiteers want to drive nations to war.

This is my first visit to the city of Danzig. It has shared the fate of the German nation for many centuries. Danzig and its sons fought in the Great War, and since then the city has endured a particularly hard lot. Now, after 20 years, she re-enters the great comity of the German nation. Much has changed in the Reich since then. What was formally States of classes and casts has now become the German people’s State.

A state which was once largely determined and governed by the interests of individual groups has now become a Reich which belongs to the german people and to no one else. The ideals governing our Reich have been instilled into this city for many, many years. Indeed, they have helped to rouse that spirit which made it possible tp preserve the German character of the town, filling it with that faith which made it hold out and wait for the hour of liberation.

The hour has come. You may judge of my own happiness that Providence has called me to realize the longings of the best of Germans. You may judge, too, how deeply moved I am at being able to speak to you and to the whole population in this venerable place of this city and land.

Once I made up my mind not to visit Danzig until this city had returned to the German Reich. I wished to enter it as its liberator. Today, this joy has been my lot.

In this joy I see, and take away with me, my abundant reward for many hours, days, weeks and months of care and worry. You must look on me, my dear people of Danzig, as the emissary of the German Reich and the whole German people who now receives you through me into our eternal community from which you will never be dismissed.

Whatever hardships may befall individual Germans in the coming months or even years will be easy to bear in the knowledge of the insoluble fellowship which enfolds and holds together our great people as a whole.

We receive you in this community, firmly resolved never to let you go again, and this resolve is of importance for the whole Movement and for the whole German people. Danzig was, is and remain German as long as there is a German nation and a German Reich. Generations will come and will go. They will all look back on the last twenty years of the separation of this city from the Reich as an unhappy period of your history. But they will not only recall the shame of the year 1918, they will also recollect with pride the time of the rise and resurrection of the German Reich which has now collected all the German tribes and unites them into a whole. We are determined to stand up for this Reich until death. Long live this Germany with its national comity of all German tribes, the German Reich!”


One of the great speeches, not only of the era, but any era! What more can you add? Hitler explains in no uncertain terms; the motivations and agendas of those behind conducting the “Phoney War”, that war was the continuance of the previous Great War, which was conducted against the German nation, a war against women, children and men, the total destruction of a country and the annihilation all her People, nothing less than total Genocide was the aim of the Allies headed by Britain and France, and America, and later Russia. And the reason for this senseless slaughter was as the Führer of Germany stated; because it suited a small private class of war-mongers and war profiteers who used the entire nations of Britain and her Allies as nothing more than mindless cannon-fodder! A proxy military force of mercenaries, one could I suppose blame them for their ignorance, that their crimes in the First and Second World Wars, their heinous crimes of barbarity committed against the women, children and men of Germany in both those wars was a result of the ignorance, the successful brainwashing that they are conditioned with from birth in their so-called Western Democracies, but that is not good enough, no, no they have the light of their conscience and the truth that they should know, being born with it, that every human being should know, this truth, these laws, universal laws of humanity are inherent in all souls if they are truly human beings! Ignorance is not an excuse for the people of Britain, France, America and all the Allies of  Zion, all those Allied to Zion paper idols of banking and usury and profiteering through ritual slaughter, the temple workers, the blind fools will be responsible for their actions, and will be held accountable whether in this life or the next, THY WILL BE DONE!!!!!