Tag Archives: Historical Revisionism

Updates

I have completed the first draft of “Third Reich Pilgrim – Part II”. Written at great speed, over a two month period, whilst suffering clinical Depression…. I recommend that one not try that at home… Now I will revise the work and continue with the second draft. I am also half way through the proof read and re-formatting of “The Lightning and the Sun”, I plan to have a Limited Edition of that work completed sometime next year, probably late next year. Thankyou to the Kamerads who took the time to leave a review on Amazon for Steve Hirst’s “Germania”. I plan to release “The Saga of Hailstorm” on Amazon in the coming days, just waiting on the Sword – “Harm” to appear. We are currently working on an improved edition of “The Golden Cord” (I still have not heard from anybody, including Amazon as to where exactly the evidence is for “legal rights ownership” for this particular translation on Amazon is? And I don’t expect I will ever hear from them. LOL….”Legal Rights” are arbitrary, of course, so there is no need for anyone to provide me with “legal evidence” of “Legal Rights”, especially on a retail sales website, and of course no such “legal rights” exist….Which, of course, even if they did exist, does not extend past the retail sales website in question.) Anyway, we are working on a new translation, so we can delete “Jason Thompkins” from the translation credits and notes. And the new translation will be greatly improved. All part of the show of colourful characters that surround the publishing work of Don Miguel Serrano…I guess…

“I imagine that they are helping to represent the seventy year anniversary since the 1945 ‘Liberation’. Concentration camps! Eye-witness accounts! Died like rats! Eye-witness accounts! Mad with hunger! Eye-witness accounts! Murder! Eye-witness accounts! Forced labour! Eye-witness accounts! Unbearable stench! Eye-witness accounts! Extermination centres! Eye-witness accounts! Bloodbath! Eye-witness accounts! Massacres! Eye-witness accounts! Executions! Eye-witness accounts! Gassings! Eye-witness accounts! Brutality! Eye-witness accounts! Killings! Eye-witness accounts! Terror! Eye-witness accounts. But you cannot question any of this because it is ‘Manifestly Obvious’!”   –  GERMANIA – Book I.

Can you work out what the repetitive refrain here is? I will give you a hint – “Eye-witness account”…..An Eye-witness account must be truthful because human beings are truthful and never lie about what they see, it is manifestly obvious that any “Eye-witness” account should be taken as truth, no matter what the circumstances or situation may be and no matter what reason or logic might decree to the contrary of the stated human “Eye-witness”… As long as the “account” is preceded by the the words “Eye-witness” it must be taken as truthful and actual fact, that overrules all other truths or facts…..Have you ever known a human being to lie????? Humans never lie, so therefore any human who stated that it has been an “Eye-witness” must be stating the absolute Truth…This is then the measure of ‘History’ and ‘Reality’, which are formed by what the Human being says it saw! Even if the human being is blind, like Homer, it is still the measure of reality because it is the stated “Eye-witness”. And the human being never lies, not even when it is within their interests to do so. Historical veracity is ascertained via eye-witness testimonies, and this is considered especially truthful when there is favour and despotic incentives offered for those who provide eye-witness testimonies that confirm the narrative, that has been formed due to the wants and needs of the humans involved. It is proven, that where the wants and needs can be placated, more and more truthful eye-witness testimonies can be found, and that this re-enforces the narrative via repetition. One, can also then state, that if it is repetitive, then it must also be true, according to human logic….

Franz Sedlacek – Ship of Fools

 

 


Koln – Mother of Harlots

These copies of Lithographs I recently purchased in Cologne for 2 euros each. They depict Cologne figure-heads and symbols and heraldry.

 

Saint Ursula is symbolic as the Mother of Harlots – Mystery Babylon, the Mother of all Colonies – Kolonies

She is also symbolic of the ermine tail and the huntress, and is related symbolically to Saint Sebastian, Baldur and Jesus

She is a composite figure, a phantasmagoria.

 

Saint George, man at arms, and defender of Cologne, figure-head of the Iron works guild of Cologne – nails, swords, spears, etc

 

Society of Jesus heraldry of Cologne, Jesus – Yeast, born in a vat, in a pub, most powerful of all commodities, all trading barons bow down to Yeast – figure-head of the Brewers Guild of Cologne. Priests and Wine and Beer, and Spirit makers are the same…They all work in the Vineyards of the Lord! “Before the Printing Press came the Wine Press” – Third Reich Pilgrim… Al-Koln-ol = Alcohol… Saint Michael, Saint Gabriel – postal delivers, merchants send their letters, receipts, book work, accounting, so forth.

 

Saint Ursula as Baldur, Psalm 64. Wears the virgin winter coat of the Stoat, the Ermine, with the black tails,

figurehead of the Furs and Tanners Guild

 

Saint George of Cologne, figure-head of Iron works. Iron nails especially, and arrow heads and spear heads, Armour, tools, etc. Related to Farriers, hence also depicted on a horse.

Nails the Vines to the cross beam and stake in the Vineyards, conqueror of the Forests, hence “Dragon” = Tree.

Wood Chopping Guild figure-head = Knight.


White Man’s Burden

White Man’s Burden – The real untold History of Britain and America, in a cartoon:

the_white_mans_burden-_judge_1899


Sons Of The Widower?

“However, with the revelation of the Jewish lies and fakery behind their myths and legends, they must also be significantly affected, because it proves that their Temple of Solomon in Palestine with its columns Boaz and Jachin, their Great Architect Hiram and their entire Judeo-Masonic symbolism and legend never actually existed. It will be such, that there will be no salvation for these Masons, lest they return to he occult origins, resurrecting the Mystery of Mysteries, and the same shall be for the Christians and Muslims, they too must understand that they cannot fight against the Sons of the Widow, because a Son of the Widow can transform and is capable of transmutation into a Son of the Widower.”  –  Miguel Serrano – “Son Of The Widower” – 2002

 

Now, Miguel Serrano has published in 2002, his belief that all of Judeo-Masonic symbolism is fakery and lies, and he mentions the Memphis Mizraim, or the Rite of Memphis and the Satanism of the Masonic Lodges. The Rite of Memphis dates to approx. 1838, instituted by two French Masons, Marconis and Moullet, in Paris. I will point out that Paris was the headquarters for the Suez Canal Company. Mizraim means “Egyptian” in Hebrew….The Managers of the construction of the Suez Canal were Jews, many of whom settled in Egypt after construction of the Suez Canal. Serrano refers to the Cainites or the descendants of Cain as the “Sons of the Widow” who “were responsible for the initial spread of Gnosticism as well as the esoteric of Memphis Mizraim in Ancient Egypt.” Which of course points to Freemasonry.  Now, Freemasonry is woven with the fable of “Ancient Egypt”. The “Widow’s Son” in the “Ancient Craft of Masonry” is applied to Hiram, the architect of the Temple, see 1st Kings 7:14. The Masons call themselves “Sons of The Widow”. In fact in French Masonry “Son of the Widow” is synonymous with Masonry. Now, Serrano begins in his book “Son of the Widow” that this millennial Temple-construct was built on a lie carefully crafted! And that the foundations of this history, this “story never existed in the first place.” Serrano also says that the Jewish Rabbis themselves admit this. That the Old and New Testaments are just fables and none of that “history” ever really happened, including “ancient Egypt” of course. However, Serrano makes it known, that he believes that the Son of the Widow is identified with the “Son of Man” which is the Astral Body. He identifies Parzival as the Son of the Widow also, and that Lilith is the Widow herself, the Bride of Lucifer.

My point here, is that in 2002, Miguel Serrano was questioning the entire History of humanity. And this is Esoteric Hitlerism.


Regensburg Walhalla

The German architect Leo von Klenze is also the designer of the Parthenon in Athens which was never completed by the Greeks, still being built in fact. The Regensburg Walhalla in Germany is older than the fake ruins of the Greek Parthenon. Third Reich Pilgrim: “Germany is the Holy Land!”

Walhalla bei Donaustauf, Aussenansicht Walhalla (Bayern), (Ruhmeshalle bei Donaustauf nahe Regens- burg, erb.1830-42 unter Ludwig I.von Bayern, Arch.: Leo von Klenze). - Aussenansicht von Suedosten. - Foto, April 2008.

Walhalla bei Donaustauf, Aussenansicht
Walhalla (Bayern),
(Ruhmeshalle bei Donaustauf nahe Regens-
burg, erb.1830-42 unter Ludwig I.von
Bayern, Arch.: Leo von Klenze).
– Aussenansicht von Suedosten. –
Foto, April 2008.

View-of-the-Valhalla-near-Regensburg


Ancient Greece did not exist

 


British Hostility Toward Germany After Munich

Hitler’s Bid for British Friendship

Chapter 8-  The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed, David L Hoggan

 

The Anglo German relationship was the most important European issue after the Munich conference. An Anglo-German understanding could mean peace, prosperity, and security for Europe. A new Anglo-German war would bring destruction, ruin, and despair. The former condition would offer nothing to the doctrine of Bolshevism, which thrived on human misery. The latter situation would present a unique opportunity for expansion to the Bolshevist leaders. It is not to be wondered that the Bolshevist leaders hated the Munich conference which had prevented an Anglo-German war. They feared that from its aftermath a permanent Anglo-German understanding would emerge. [1]

The British attitude toward Germany was the crux of the problem. The attitude of Hitler toward Great Britain was favourable from the standpoint of establishing the permanent peace between the two nations which had been envisaged in the Anglo-German friendship declaration of September 30, 1938. Hitler hoped to avoid what he considered to have been the failures of Hohenzollern Germany. He condemned the idea of a large German navy, which had been brilliantly advocated before 1914 by Admiral von Tirpitz. He was unenthusiastic about the acquisition of German colonies overseas, and he regarded Germany’s legal right to her former colonies as a mere bargaining counter. Hitler opposed trade rivalry between Germany and Great Britain. He wished the British to preserve their world commercial supremacy. [2]

The attitude of Hitler was familiar to the British leaders. The prominent Labour Party spokesman, George Lansbury, who had been the chief of the British Labour Party until 1935, had done what he could to inform the British Conservative leaders of Hitler’s ideas. Lansbury met with Hitler in Berlin on April 19, 1937. He was greatly impressed with the German leader, and he was convinced that he did not desire war. Lansbury discussed Hitler with Lord Halifax, and he rendered strong support to Chamberlain at the time of the Munich conference. He emphasized that no important section of the British population opposed Chamberlain’s trip to Munich. [3]

Arnold Toynbee, a leading English historian and an expert on international affairs, had visited Hitler in March 1936. He returned to England with a clear impression of Hitler’s ideas. He informed Conservative Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin that Adolf Hitler was a sincere advocate of peace and close friendship between Great Britain and Germany. [4]

Thomas Jones, the closest friend of Lloyd George and Stanley Baldwin, had excellent connections with British statesmen. He was with Hitler in Munich on May 17, 1936. Jones was on close terms with Ribbentrop, and he was fully informed about Hitler’s attitudes. Hitler had said that if an Anglo-German understanding was achieved, “my biggest life’s desire will be accomplished.” Jones promised Hitler in Munich that Great Britain hoped “to get alongside Germany,” and he praised Hitler’s decision to give the English language priority after German, in German schools, as a significant contribution to future contacts between the two nations. [5]

[1] G.A. Deborin, Vtoraya Mirovaya Voyna, Moscow, 1958, pp. 15-38

[2] Fritz Hesse, Das Spiel um Deutschland, 1953, pp. 14-15. An excellent reference to Hitler’s single-minded desire for friendship and collaboration with Great Britain is Walter Ansel, Hitler Confronts England, Durham N.C. 1960, pp. 10-13.

[3] Raymond Postage, The Life of George Lansbury, London, 1951, pp. 313-317

[4] Thomas Jones, A Diary with Letters, 1931-1950, London, 1954, pp. 180-181.

[5] Ibid., pp. 197-200.