Category Archives: History

Travels in Oz, Part II

In the hotel lobby I picked up a book whilst waiting for the taxi, “A History of Adelaide”…I patiently perused the expensive, glossy pages of lies…And within the text something jumped out at me, as it often happens, as if arresting me with force, a confirmation, a seeming confirmation from the Void of textual weavings…This often happens whilst reading through various publications, from academic text books to holiday brochures, from obscure philosophical treatises to common advertisement signs, sometimes words jump out and arrest me with force… In this case the book disclosed that there had been several times in Adelaide’s history where the German population had changed their names en masse. The latest instances being during World War I and II, where the German population of Adelaide and all over Australia had their names Anglicized and the reason was stated for this was to “avoid persecution”… So, the persecuation of Germans was a defining factor in the Anglicization of Adelaide and the rest of Australia…I know this to be true, it seems evident to me, and it is also admittedly so, the System Itself admits this to be so…It follows that if the German people changed their names, even when they must have been a majority at early stages of colonial settlement, then the geographical place-names would have been changed also, which I see evidence of, all over Australia, and all over the world, names being changed from German to English (and also “Aboriginal”… More and more names will  become Aboriginalized in the future as the linguistics of the System deteriorate over time, much Hullabaloo Dumpty Doo Timbuktoo over nothing me thinks. Imagine, if you will, how it must be for me, to have such constantly paradoxical thoughts that contradict the world…A lonely enterprise assigned to me…But a process of Individualization that seems necessary nonetheless..But the world itself proves its own contradictory nature… In a social sense…My Nazism, contradictory, began with not a feeling of National Socialism, but with Anti-Nationalism and Anti-Socialism sentiments… Nationalism as Alienation and Socialism as Delinquency… So has been the experience.

The German persecution of Germans, appears to be a German concept, as is Nationalism and Socialism… There are still many original German Social Clubs in Australia, as there are all over the world, the first “Social Clubs” were German in origin, and they persecuted themselves…It is not possible for the 2% to persecute the 98% when the masses rule Zion by Force of arms alone… This is something of a revelation, and it needs to be considered in depth.

On the train, I looked out at the vast expanses of semi-arid desert and bushland, an inhospitable place… One cannot survive out here without help…Nothing lives out here except for a few plants and lots of rocks and dirt… Lost here amongst the gray bush are the ghosts of emigrants:

“Come listen to my sad lament

About the bush of Australia,

the cattle dies, the sheep they rot,

Savage is the land of Australia

It really is a horrid spot

way down here in Australia,

Better to earn seven bob a week

than to die a freak

searching the wilds of Australia…”

Nothing survives out here, there is nothing to eat, nothing to drink, you will die of heat during the day, and freeze to death of a night, you wont last very long out here in the Outback, not without help… No grass out here, unless it is introduced and cultivated with water delivered in trucks and trains… The native “grass” is Spinifex, which has the same content as glass… Try eating glass, feed your cattle glass, see how far you get, does not matter, you can always lie about it afterwards…The expense that the first emigrants went to in order to build a railway up through the center of Australia is mind-boggling, I cant even imagine how it would be possible with just horses, camels, men….Seems impossible…. You know they say, out here that the “cattle Stations” are so huge they are millions of acres in size? This is very strange because cattle cannot survive out here without fresh water being delivered to them via rail (and trucks now also, since the roads have been built in places)… That’s right…No reliable water sources out here…The humans lie that they can sometimes find water by digging down into the dry hard salt laden ground to find “pockets” of fresh water! LOL….Yea sure…That’s a good joke… The water evaporates in the outback so quickly, that even when it does rain once every few years, the water often evaporates before it hits the ground! If ponds of water are created by rain, then they dry out, they dry out faster then the cattle could be mustered and driven towards the water… Sorry to say, but one cannot raise cattle out here without help, without water and feed being delivered to feed-lot stations the cattle dies within 7 days… So, no such thing as huge “cattle stations” in the Outback, the cattle herds stay within small enclosed areas near the railways tracks and roads waiting for water and feed to be delivered to them…. What is out there on the huge “cattle stations”????  Nothing….Nothing…. Not even kangaroos live out there, matey… Kangaroos live near golf courses and farms that are regularly fertilized…. They can survive near the main Rivers of Australia, like the rest of the fauna, but they cannot survive in the Outback. Even the reptiles and insects dont go out there….Only if they get lost, and then they die out there too…. Mostly, the reptiles and insects stay close to human farms…Because that is where the fucking food and water is!!!!! Generally, “wild-life” is not wild, but also dependent on co-habitation with the human settlements, usually on the outskirts of human populations, or they follow humans where they go.,,, I have heard, around the traps, at various times, that the Animals are the old “Slaves of Atlantis”, that they were workers at some stage, created to work as slaves but that they have been re-assigned to another role – as “wild-life… They were used by the upper class as target practice for guns… That’s how wild-life Tourism started out… And then they were classified as “vermin” and shot at again by middle class settlers and farmers (still this way now), but they also developed a wild-life industry, pretending that Animals are “wild” and “native”….Animals are no more native than humans…

Anyway, the Flies out here, they need moisture, a tremendous amount of flies descend upon you trying to suck the moisture from your pores… Flies go with animals, cattle, and humans, flies dont survive without these essentials… And Lies, so many lies, lies go with animals, cattle and humans… I was informed in Alice Springs, that the name comes from the fact that there are no “Springs” in Alice….Which makes sense, because there are no water Springs in Alice Springs… But as all Australians inform, with their Double-Speak, the water can be found under the dry Rivers… The River run upside down in the Outback – they are “Up-side down Rivers”, so although they are as dry as dead dingo’s donger on top, they run with cool fresh drinking water underneath!!!! LOL… But they are serious…Its true, you can look it up, or go here yourself – the Rivers are upside down! This is how the native, royal, “traditional landowners” survived for 40 billion years, in harmony with the land, 40 billion, trillion years before stupid ole whitey turned up, bumbling round and fucking things up with his lack of respect for the bountiful land of sweet harmony… How the Settlers bred with their the Lilliputians, I have no idea, but they did, and now, the half-castes are really something with the lies and the flies…I mean, Yeastus Baby Barley Corn, there is something to be said about about monastical life! And they called themselves “Lutherians”…. Because the first settlement out here was not Alice Springs, it was “Hermannsburg”, now one can go and visit the original Lutheran German old town, its on the tourist itinerary, one of those arresting forces that the Matrix throws up in your face, and yet nobody notices it… But there it is, sitting there in stone – Hermannsburg….They will change all that though, and re-name it “Arunda Namajeraa” or something like that… And everyone, German Lutheran to Anglo-Saxon to Aboriginal to half-caste mongrel, will pretend that you dont need to construct a great big railway to get water here and supplies, you can just do as the local “traditional owners” used to do, but dont do anymore, you can just dig down and you will find cool, clean drinking water, amply supplied by Mother Nature Herself…. It’s all about the spiritual harmony out here….One can easily survive on “bush tucker” and “upside down rivers”, no need for railways and roads and petrol stations….Just ask the locals, they will tell you…

 

 


Travels in Oz, Part I

The train crossed the bridge, and the driver announced over the intercom that we were passing, to the right – “the oldest bridge in Australia” – Murray Bridge in South Australia. Murray Bridge is located at the head of the Murray River, on the shores of the fresh water Lake Alexandrina. To have a large fresh water lake in a coastal area at the mouth of a river, with easy access to the sheltered bays of Encounter Bay and Horseshoe Bay on the Fleuriea Peninsula is very rare. If a geographer was going decide where would the ideal place would be to set up a colony in Australia it would be here… And this was the first Australian settlement, not Sydney and Botany Bay in New South Wales. Like all of history, Australian history has been completely re-arranged, falsified, etc. So the oldest settlement areas in Australia are in South Australia, and this makes sense also from a maritime perspective where the first fleets would have arrived via the Cape of Good Hope, along the Roaring Forties, up into the Great Australian Bight and into South Australia (The entire “history of “Captain Cook” being nothing more than invented stories.) Also having access to the major river system through Lake Alexandrina to the Murray River, as the major navigable River in Australia, means that this area would have been first chosen as the base from which to explore further inland and to be able to travel along. Major human settlements are always first established on River Crossings, and navigable rivers are essential trade and exploration routes. Now, all the names have been changed at some stage, the names would have been different, most place-names in Australia, like anywhere else have been changed, in the case of Australia, like England, the place-names were Anglicized in the 19th Century. Originally the place-names would have been Germanic sounding names, and linguistic remnants still remain here in Australia of this. So yea, first important point here, is that South Australia is where the first human settlements were established, in Australia…. I will now add, that when the first European Settlers got here, they found no other human presence… There were no “natives” in Australia, the land was utterly devoid of human habitation and showed not a single sign that a human had ever been here….There was also another paradoxical observation, there was barely any sign of life at all! I mean, even bird life was rare…And there appeared to be no large animals…Fauna, in Australia, although this has been completely suppressed and lied about, like in New Zealand and all New Lands, in fact, there was no large fauna when the first European Settlers arrived, but the fauna appeared later over a number of years in and around the first human settlements. Of course many animals were brought to Australia, but the so-called “native fauna” was absent at first, it only appeared later when humans had already settled down…. Something very strange, but a great effort has been made by the humans to cover this up. No doubt.

So I continued on to Adelaide, and Adelaide is Australia’s first major city, not Sydney… Adelaide is older than Sydney, and one can discern that from the architectural and construction details. But the name, firstly, is taken from, and this is one of those linguistic remnants, the Duchess of Saxony (Princess Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen) – Adelheid. So originally it was Adelheid, and then it was Anglicized to Adelaide. And then one traces this corporate logo, because that is what it is, a corporate logo, one traces it back to the colony of London which is a colony of Hanover, Germany. Links to private shipping companies associated through the River Crossing Guild, companies for the Mysteries of Adventures and Exploration, etc… Another clue here is that Adelaide, did not assume the false “convict settlement history” like the other Australia cities… So either this clue has been left deliberately or its just one of those errors that pops up. Adelaide is known as the “City of Churches”, because it has the many old churches. Adelaide has the most historical building listing in Australia, because Adelaide has the oldest buildings of any major capital city in Australia. Again, this turns the entire “recorded” history of Australia on its head…And nobody knows any of this, and nobody would even want to know about it…Which makes my question why I would even bother to write about it…Another interesting point – The Barossa Valley, this cultivation of vines being congruent with “missions” to new lands and, Lutheran Germans…I mean one could write several books on that relationship… Anyway, I stayed the night in Hahndorf, just outside of Adelaide in the hills, Hahndorf, still retains the original German names and was also settled by the German Lutherans, and of course, one finds there, sausages, sauerkraut and alcohol, the Lutherans being acolytes of The Brewer’s Guild.


Atlantis, Edda and Bible

 

More copies of Atlantis, Edda & Bible are now available. Four parcels of printed books went missing for a few months and then finally turned up at my door step!


The Demolition of Britain by Britain

The Demolition of Britain by Britain, formally known as the “Battle of Britain”…

It was impossible for the Luftwaffe to attack Britain independently, because the German Luftwaffe had no independence from the general German Army. The structure and administration, as anybody knows who has studied in any detail the Third Reich military, knows, or must know, that the Luftwaffe could not operate independently from the general army, meaning it was logistically and operationally and even theoretically impossible for the German Luftwaffe to attack Britain independently…  There is no mandate for the “Battle of Britain” and there is no credible evidence that the German Luftwaffe bombed Britain.

“The Germans had no preparations to attack Britain; no mandate, no declaration and no intention, no reason can be shown to be adequate, and there is no credible evidence that proves that the German Luftwaffe attacked Britain, the Luftwaffe had no long-range bombing capability, its military structure and capability was designed only to assist ground forces. From a strictly military point of view it was not possible for Germany to launch a bombing campaign on the British Isles, and there is no declaration of such military intent. But there is military intent by Britain to make it look as though Germany had bombed Britain…..Painting a swastika on an aircraft and dumping it in a field is not difficult. There were entire British War departments that designed such props and phoney articles of war, after all, the first casualty of war is truth, and deception is the essence of modern warfare…..etc” Page 111, Third Reich Pilgrim: The Ruins Of Power.


The Phoney Battle Of Britain

All wars are Phoney to a certain degree. One of the most clearly phoney or faked “battles” is the Battle of Britain. It is obvious that the German Luftwaffe never attacked Britain. I wrote about this, a mere few paragraphs in Third Reich Pilgrim, nobody really picked up on that besides a few individuals in the entire world, that is because the entire world is phoney and there are only a few conscious individuals in the world… I have not been able to determine, whether this individual consciousness is entirely new, I mean whether it has only recently appeared. So, anyway, I was writing earlier about photography and how there was color photography in 1940 but the war departments were only in those days releasing black and white poor quality photos, and then after the war they started to color the photos and release better quality photos. Here are some faked photos of the phony Battle of Britain:

Now, what we see in this photo, that it is theatrically designed, like a stage set, it is real, in the sense that the objects are real, but the objects have been carefully placed as props to add effect to the theatrical dramaturgy of the scene. This is not a bomb explosion, this is not the results of a bomb explosion, this is the result of an excavation! The road has been excavated with machinery, dug up, and then the bus has been lowered or pushed down into the crater. As one can see there is no fire damage to the scene, it is a civil excavation scene that has been created by machinery to make it look like a bombing raid scene. No bombs were dropped in this scene and there were no explosions… All the people involved in the making of this scene are like automatons, they are simply unconsciousness robots in human garb, who then work together as a hive mind to concoct a story that goes along with the general narratives of the phoney war. So they are all part of it, all the humans partake in this scene making. For what reason, I do not know, but the scene is fake and the photo is fake, and the people are fake.

This photo is meant to show the results of a German bombing raid on Britain. As one can see the photo has been meticulously staged, but a little too much I think, this one has been overdone and it loses authenticity. The Photographer was John Hinde who mainly did postcards. Interestingly the photographer John Hinde was a circus publicity manager, so he was perfect for the job of designed photo shoots for the “Battle of Britain” and that is what the Battle of Britain was a “photo shoot”.

This photo is of the Parliament houses after a “German bombing raid”. No bombs have been dropped here, this is a demolition job, using demolition machinery. The British have used demolition equipment and machinery to tear down their own parliament! It’s amazing, but it’s the truth, but who cares right? There nobody out there to listen anyway! LOL… I could go through a thousand photos, just like these ones, all of them would be faked, all of Britain itself would be fake so all those involved are fake, just fakers doing fake things, generation after generation! From the very top, right down to your common street bum, they are all fake!


Interesting nodes

Joachim von Ribbenthrop:

Edward VIII was compelled to abdicate because one was not sure whether he would lend a hand to a policy of hostility towards Germany. Chamberlain has now appointed Vansittart, our most important and toughest opponent, to such a position as enables him to take a leading part in the diplomatic play against Germany. However much one might, in the meantime, for tactical reasons, try to come to an understanding with us, every single day in the future in which our political considerations should fail to be fundamentally, determined by the thought of England as our most dangerous opponent, would be a gain for our enemies.”

I found this is in “Lightning And The Sun” as I was just reformatting Savitri Devi’s book, (and it is taking a long time…) But this struck me as interesting, an interesting connective node but without an explanatory resolution.

It took Hitler years to try and understand that England could be Germany’s opponent, he simply could not understand, at first, how this could be… Von Ribbenthrop understood this much more easily. Von Ribbenthrop married into money, into wine money, so he married into the Brewer’s Guild. He was handsome, athletic and adventurous, and multi-lingual, so he made a good front-man or salesman, he was basically described as a “businessman”… So he did some “business” and that is what he did – “business”…How von Ribbenthrop became the foreign minister of the Third Reich is all a bit of mystery of connecting nodes and how they play-act together. He is clearly unqualified for the job, unlike his friend Franz von Papen, who appears to be much more powerful and qualified, so it seems if it was not for his friendship with von Papen, von Ribbenthrop would not have progressed very far in politics, von Papen was also a handsome, athletic and adventurous man who married into money, much more money than von Ribbenthrop, so they both had some things in common, and, especially their common knowledge of both French and English languages.

Anyway, Ribbenthrop identifies Sir Robert Vansitartt as the prime adversary in England.

Certainly – Sir Baron Lord Vansitartt Ratface of the Actor’s Guild.

He certainly has that Judeo-British look about him, which comes from the Dutch-Deutsche biological lines. Holland being a Deutsche peninsula, or just some land that the Germans reclaimed from the sea – LOL – that’s Holland – some land that the Germans made into a peninsula….LOL…Anway, Sir Ratface has that Dutchee look about him…. Remember that saying – “The only good Dutch is a dead Dutch!” I once worked for a Dutchman on a farm, and he was a f****ing C**T….Looked a bit like Sir Ratface… Anyway, in this politischespiele Sir British Ratface from Holland-Germany was a baddee, from the German point of view, a bit like Lord Halifax was also viewed as a baddee. Sir Vansitartt’s resume does look like it makes him qualified for his position as Under-Secretary of the State of Foreign Affairs. Sir Vansitartt was so anti-German that he thought that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Britain! He thought that Germany had benefited from the Treaty of Versailles, because it allowed certain Germans to borrow money from Britain???? That was his reasoning??? I don’t have an explanation for that reasoning…In this play, Vansitartt, in regard to Germany, from which his family had originally come from, played an opposing role. What Vansitartt wanted for Germany is exactly what has happened, he advocated that Germany by destroyed wholesale, every faction destroyed, not to favour any one side in Germany, but to completely annihilate all the German factions and then re-educate the Germans with a hatred for Germany…Which is a feeling Vansitartt already had in himself, being of German descent, as is the rest of Britain…Of course, when Germany was destroyed, Britain was destroyed also, which is why Hitler could not understand why the British would want to destroy Germany. Hitler could not understand that… Von Ribbenthrop could understand it though, and Lord Ratface, and von Papen, and the rest of the actors…Hitler just did not fit into the troupe very well….But Oh how they need Him… As Ratface Vansitartt wanted but could not state accurately, the British wanted war with the Fatherland because they wanted to destroy the power of the Fatherland so that British power would also be destroyed because the British were entirely reliant on the Fatherland. And now the evidence of that is clearly seen today. One can clearly see that Britain is completely destroyed, like Germany. So the outcome is the same, you see, because of these connecting nodes, but it is not said as much because there are merely actors playing parts in a play. Sir Ratface wrote many plays himself, comedies mainly, and some poetry. This is the most interesting point: Sir Ratface wrote comedy…He also wrote songs and screenplays…Vansitartt’s first wife was an Heppenheimer, a wealthy German-American. Vansitartt was also involved in film making…..And this is the really, really interesting point…Colour Motion Pictures…So I just highlight this little connective node, interesting little point – In 1932, Agfacolor products were produced in Germany by Agfa-Farbenplatte. They all had colour film technology by the early 1930’s and that was in public release…Of course they like to say that Kodakchrome was first and then Agfa a year later, as if the Americans has superior colour-dye innovations to the Germans??? Anyway, these chaps could all produce colour cartoons in the 1930’s…If they wanted to. Apparently the British had colour film as early as 1902!!! Problem there in how the fabric is woven….So, for example we have fantasy films and cartoons like Fantasia, Donald Duck, The Wizard of Oz, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and Robin Hood, but war footage is still in black and white??? And of a lessor quality in terms of film quality and production.  Problem there with the Technicolor film dates. The Phantom Of The Opera was in partial Technicolor in 1925! Or the aptly named Show of Shows in 1929. But all the WWII footage is in Black and White monochrome film. And they had color photography but all the pictures are in Black and White…. They are only starting now to colour the WWII photographs, decades later. Making Technicolour movies for fantasy motion pictures was more expensive than making fantasy motion pictures for World War! LOL… Let’s have a look at a Black and White film from 1940, called The Shop around the Corner:

These are the Gentile actors, as opposed to the Jewish actors, the Gentile actors look much better, finer features. they look more trustworthy, dont they? That is why they are on the film…The Shop Around the Corner is a romantic comedy produced in America but set in Budapest. The film is produced by a German-American, Ernst Lubvitsch, who was born in Berlin, but worked in Hollywood, like alot of German film makers did. Here a pic of the Ratfaced Lubvitsch:

Can you see the differences between the Jewish actors and the Gentile actors? It’s like a creature with two heads… These days the question is redundant because there is nobody left who can read faces let alone be able to grasp that there are two faces and one creature. Anyway the main point is that the quality of the war footage and photography is of an inferior standard to the the motion picture The Shop around the Corner, when one compares Black and White films and photography. So the footage of WWII action being released to the public is of a lower quality than the motion picture films that are being released to the public…And the public does not see the difference in the quality, nor question why the war footage would be of lessor quality. The war footage of WWII looks like it was made with 1890’s film technology!!! Why would that be? I dont know…It’s just very poor quality film compared to say The Shop around the Corner. The film technology exists, it is just not being used for war footage. This has happened in all the “wars”, very poor quality films are being used. And that is something all the film producers had in common, whether in Russia, Britain, America, France or Germany, all were using inferior quality film for their war footage…. I think that is rather odd, don’t you?


HerrenVolk

The German National Socialist term “Herrenvolk” has always been mistranslated as “Master Race”. Nobody, neither German or Englishman has ever translated this word correctly, it has been stated by a couple of lonely individuals that the translation is incorrect….Obviously it cannot be translated as “Master Race” because the literal translation of Master Race would be “Meister Rasse”, which is a completely different meaning to Herrenvolk. So completely obvious is this but it has always eluded the comprehension of humanity who has endevoured to make so much hullabaloo about this word but such a hullabaloo of hubris works efficiently when 99.80% of humanity is hubris.

The aim of German National Socialism was as Hitler stated in Mein Kampf to “transform our ideal vision of the People’s State into a reality”….National Socialism was an ideal that Hitler attempted to transform into a reality. Now to the etymology: The word “Sir” in English derives from it parent language – German – “Herr”….This is a public term, for example in a restaurant the customer would be addressed as “Herr”. It is a public honourific, a term of respect when addressing someone…It is not a Title anymore than the Title in English – “Mister” or “Gentleman”….One could say colloquially “Good Day my good Sir” or “And for you Sir, what will it be?”…In the way that Herr can be used to describe “master” it means that the man is a master of himself more so than the master of anyone else. If the man was the master of anyone else, in etymological terms then he would be given another title which in German there are many titles which inform of rank and hierarchy. The word Herr derives from Herro, which is from where the English word “Hero” is derived. In Germanic Dutch it is “heer” and in the Germanic Swedish it is “herre”. Herr also means in reference to God. In the reference in which it is applied to a Volk, it can only mean “Proud”, “Venerable” or “Noble”…..An accurate translation of Herrenvolk could be “A People of Gentlemen”….And that would be much more accurate as for what was intended by the term. But there are many different translations that one could make. Another could be – “Noble Folk”, or “A Venerable People”, or in a religious sense “A Lordly People” or even a more irreligious “The People Themselves are Lords”……

Now, just looking here in Mein Kampf I will point out another quote which is relevant to this discussion: “The trend of development which we are now experiencing would, if allowed to go unhampered would lead to the realisation of the Pan-Jewish prophecy that the Jews will one day devour the other nations and become lords of the earth. In contrast to the millions of bourgeois and proletarian Germans who are stumbling to their ruin, mostly through timidity, indolence and stupidity, the Jew pursues his way persistently and keeps his eye always fixed on the future goal. Any party that is led by him can fight for no other interests than his, and his interests certainly have nothing in common with those of the Aryan nations.”

Hitler can identify that only His National Socialism can hamper the Jews devouring the nations. But what He does not understand is that there are no “Aryan Nations” and the Jews have always been at the head of the “Nations”. Which He does acknowledge but the thought is unresolved, that National Socialism would first have to do away with the current State and replace it with another in order to be successful, because the present State as it was (1923 in Germany), was indeed Jewish in conception and practice. Which is why Hitler points out that the millions of bourgeois and proletarian Germans are merely stumbling blindly to their ruin….But the ultimate point is that 98.00% of Germans are just Gentiles who blindly follow the Jews and their destiny is wholly Jewish too. The Gentiles and the Jews are one and this is something that Hitler could not see until it was too late. It is not merely an alliance between Jews and Gentiles, it is a symbiotic relationship that is a biological instinct. As Constantin Franz stated – the invention of Nation States was to furnish an opportunity to explore and exploit the reciprocal relations of different states for the large banking houses. Lending to a Nation State was more profitable than lending to an individual. As it has been adequately revealed in the past as soon as Jews entered into this affair of state relations they instigated wars with the full compliance of their Gentile supporters, in every example the Jews became the most chosen leaders of opinion of every nationality. Chosen by whom? Chosen by the Gentiles, that is whom. Jews only made up 2% of the German population, but that was ten times as many Jews as what there was in France or Britain! Because Germany is the original Homeland of the Jewish people (as I reveal in Third Reich Pilgrim). The Jew was quite comfortable playing the German Patriot, the French Chauvinist, or the British Imperialist, or the Polish Nationalist. And it was easy to ferment discord with one Nation against another because the Gentiles also played this role. By arousing one nation against another new profits were generated and new wars followed. The Jews of course took to the Stock-Markets while the Gentiles took to the trenches and manufacturing factories…Because that was their nature to do so. The nature of the “Nation State” is a symbiotic relationship between Jew and Gentile. It has always been the case with the pure Jew that he cannot tolerate spending money, it hurts and pains him to spend money, only the half or quarter Jew can just barely spend a little money, but that is nothing compared to the Gentile who spends with reckless abandon, and cares not where money comes from or what it is, only whether he obtains it, and then, subsequently spends it, preferably on himself. The Jewish monetary system cannot operate without the Gentile. and the population of Jews must be kept low because they don’t spend any money, they only loan money. The pure Jew walks to work in an old black suit, he does not even wash because that would cost money! He simply cannot bare to spend money which is why he loans it out to the Gentile, who loves nothing better than to spend money. It is the Gentile who likes fast expensive showy cars and grand houses. The Jew lives in a musty old flat and sells insurance policies for fast expensive cars and grand houses, because the insurance policy is more profitable…The Jew has always been the collector of tolls and taxes, the Treasurer, the keeper of the counting house. Do Jews have fashion? No, the Gentiles do, the Gentiles must change their fashion every week so that they can be more hubris…The Jews just wear the same old black suit, generation after generation…But the Jews could never exist without their Gentiles, those millions of bourgeois and proletarian Gentiles which make up 98% of the demographics.

National Socialism was only Hitler’s Ideal Love, a Love that the People could never live up to. Gentiles and Jews could not comprehend Hitler’s Ideal, so they destroyed it.

It is not that the Jews will devour the Nations or the so-called misnomer of “Aryan Nations” but that the Jews and Gentiles will devour themselves.

Herrenvolk – “The People themselves are Lords”…. What pure Idealism of the Highest order could imagine such a thing on this earth. Hitler was the purest Idealist.