We Are the Dispossessed, By Kamerad Kristof
Category Archives: Ehrean Race
Staged composite photo of a Panzer IV in Nyiregyhaza, 1944, Hungary, and now… Problem is that they got the photo collage wrong, they mismatched the pieces when they were putting the photo together…. Ooooops…Reflections of Disintegration.
Joachim von Ribbenthrop:
“Edward VIII was compelled to abdicate because one was not sure whether he would lend a hand to a policy of hostility towards Germany. Chamberlain has now appointed Vansittart, our most important and toughest opponent, to such a position as enables him to take a leading part in the diplomatic play against Germany. However much one might, in the meantime, for tactical reasons, try to come to an understanding with us, every single day in the future in which our political considerations should fail to be fundamentally, determined by the thought of England as our most dangerous opponent, would be a gain for our enemies.”
I found this is in “Lightning And The Sun” as I was just reformatting Savitri Devi’s book, (and it is taking a long time…) But this struck me as interesting, an interesting connective node but without an explanatory resolution.
It took Hitler years to try and understand that England could be Germany’s opponent, he simply could not understand, at first, how this could be… Von Ribbenthrop understood this much more easily. Von Ribbenthrop married into money, into wine money, so he married into the Brewer’s Guild. He was handsome, athletic and adventurous, and multi-lingual, so he made a good front-man or salesman, he was basically described as a “businessman”… So he did some “business” and that is what he did – “business”…How von Ribbenthrop became the foreign minister of the Third Reich is all a bit of mystery of connecting nodes and how they play-act together. He is clearly unqualified for the job, unlike his friend Franz von Papen, who appears to be much more powerful and qualified, so it seems if it was not for his friendship with von Papen, von Ribbenthrop would not have progressed very far in politics, von Papen was also a handsome, athletic and adventurous man who married into money, much more money than von Ribbenthrop, so they both had some things in common, and, especially their common knowledge of both French and English languages.
Anyway, Ribbenthrop identifies Sir Robert Vansitartt as the prime adversary in England.
Certainly – Sir Baron Lord Vansitartt Ratface of the Actor’s Guild.
He certainly has that Judeo-British look about him, which comes from the Dutch-Deutsche biological lines. Holland being a Deutsche peninsula, or just some land that the Germans reclaimed from the sea – LOL – that’s Holland – some land that the Germans made into a peninsula….LOL…Anway, Sir Ratface has that Dutchee look about him…. Remember that saying – “The only good Dutch is a dead Dutch!” I once worked for a Dutchman on a farm, and he was a f****ing C**T….Looked a bit like Sir Ratface… Anyway, in this politischespiele Sir British Ratface from Holland-Germany was a baddee, from the German point of view, a bit like Lord Halifax was also viewed as a baddee. Sir Vansitartt’s resume does look like it makes him qualified for his position as Under-Secretary of the State of Foreign Affairs. Sir Vansitartt was so anti-German that he thought that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Britain! He thought that Germany had benefited from the Treaty of Versailles, because it allowed certain Germans to borrow money from Britain???? That was his reasoning??? I don’t have an explanation for that reasoning…In this play, Vansitartt, in regard to Germany, from which his family had originally come from, played an opposing role. What Vansitartt wanted for Germany is exactly what has happened, he advocated that Germany by destroyed wholesale, every faction destroyed, not to favour any one side in Germany, but to completely annihilate all the German factions and then re-educate the Germans with a hatred for Germany…Which is a feeling Vansitartt already had in himself, being of German descent, as is the rest of Britain…Of course, when Germany was destroyed, Britain was destroyed also, which is why Hitler could not understand why the British would want to destroy Germany. Hitler could not understand that… Von Ribbenthrop could understand it though, and Lord Ratface, and von Papen, and the rest of the actors…Hitler just did not fit into the troupe very well….But Oh how they need Him… As Ratface Vansitartt wanted but could not state accurately, the British wanted war with the Fatherland because they wanted to destroy the power of the Fatherland so that British power would also be destroyed because the British were entirely reliant on the Fatherland. And now the evidence of that is clearly seen today. One can clearly see that Britain is completely destroyed, like Germany. So the outcome is the same, you see, because of these connecting nodes, but it is not said as much because there are merely actors playing parts in a play. Sir Ratface wrote many plays himself, comedies mainly, and some poetry. This is the most interesting point: Sir Ratface wrote comedy…He also wrote songs and screenplays…Vansitartt’s first wife was an Heppenheimer, a wealthy German-American. Vansitartt was also involved in film making…..And this is the really, really interesting point…Colour Motion Pictures…So I just highlight this little connective node, interesting little point – In 1932, Agfacolor products were produced in Germany by Agfa-Farbenplatte. They all had colour film technology by the early 1930’s and that was in public release…Of course they like to say that Kodakchrome was first and then Agfa a year later, as if the Americans has superior colour-dye innovations to the Germans??? Anyway, these chaps could all produce colour cartoons in the 1930’s…If they wanted to. Apparently the British had colour film as early as 1902!!! Problem there in how the fabric is woven….So, for example we have fantasy films and cartoons like Fantasia, Donald Duck, The Wizard of Oz, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs and Robin Hood, but war footage is still in black and white??? And of a lessor quality in terms of film quality and production. Problem there with the Technicolor film dates. The Phantom Of The Opera was in partial Technicolor in 1925! Or the aptly named Show of Shows in 1929. But all the WWII footage is in Black and White monochrome film. And they had color photography but all the pictures are in Black and White…. They are only starting now to colour the WWII photographs, decades later. Making Technicolour movies for fantasy motion pictures was more expensive than making fantasy motion pictures for World War! LOL… Let’s have a look at a Black and White film from 1940, called The Shop around the Corner:
These are the Gentile actors, as opposed to the Jewish actors, the Gentile actors look much better, finer features. they look more trustworthy, dont they? That is why they are on the film…The Shop Around the Corner is a romantic comedy produced in America but set in Budapest. The film is produced by a German-American, Ernst Lubvitsch, who was born in Berlin, but worked in Hollywood, like alot of German film makers did. Here a pic of the Ratfaced Lubvitsch:
Can you see the differences between the Jewish actors and the Gentile actors? It’s like a creature with two heads… These days the question is redundant because there is nobody left who can read faces let alone be able to grasp that there are two faces and one creature. Anyway the main point is that the quality of the war footage and photography is of an inferior standard to the the motion picture The Shop around the Corner, when one compares Black and White films and photography. So the footage of WWII action being released to the public is of a lower quality than the motion picture films that are being released to the public…And the public does not see the difference in the quality, nor question why the war footage would be of lessor quality. The war footage of WWII looks like it was made with 1890’s film technology!!! Why would that be? I dont know…It’s just very poor quality film compared to say The Shop around the Corner. The film technology exists, it is just not being used for war footage. This has happened in all the “wars”, very poor quality films are being used. And that is something all the film producers had in common, whether in Russia, Britain, America, France or Germany, all were using inferior quality film for their war footage…. I think that is rather odd, don’t you?
New Excerpt from upcoming Part II of Third Reich Pilgrim – Gnostalgic Ehrean.
The road winded its way up through fields of golden wheat, edged by green woods; small townships nestled in the valleys of the dark hills, the clear expanse of the sky-dome shone down on the meandering, glistening serpent-like Danube River. I followed the path of flagstone steps, under a canopy of arched sylvan boughs. A green lawn stretched out and the Architectural dignity of Walhalla revealed itself in monumental splendour. The true “Parthenon” on the Germanic “Acropolis” of Donaustauf, overlooking the Danube. The Germanishe Tektonic Walhalla is another seminal construction that preceded “Ancient Greece” (Griechenlands). It was Germany that formed the first “independent Greek State”, and Ludwig I of Bavaria, whom was the patron figurehead of Walhalla on the Danube, was the father of modern (ancient) Greece, which arises in the early 19th Century A.D.. Archaeology, as a deceitful magic trick, begins in Germany in the 1780’s. Before that time there was no such thing as Archaeology or ‘Archaeological Artifacts’, they are German inventions, cunningly devised artful deceptions, which the Germans transposed to foreign lands, denigrating their own original culture, in a form of self-immolation and self-mutilation. Their own culture they shifted to inferior lands and set up entirely fake chronologies and histories that hid the truth of their own superior and original history. So it can be clearly observed with a man’s senses that the Walhalla in Germany pre-dates the Greek Parthenon in Greece, and that the Germans are responsible for designing and constructing Greece to make it appear to be older than what it is… Ancient Greece is no older the German founded modern Greek State, of which Ludwig I (‘King Louis’ in English and French) of Bavaria, is the founding father. Ludwig I is the Crown Prince Elector of Bavaria, Count Palatine of the Rhine, the Arch-Steward of the Reich, the Duke of Berg, King of Bavaria and chief Sponsor of Romantic Hellenism! Ludwig’s son Otto was the first King of Greece. An unknown secret of his-story, is all that “Ottoman” stories from literature and art, relate to the German “Otto’s”, and the “Ottoman Empire” is an Empire belonging to one of the many Germanic King Otto’s, the designation “Ottoman” is code for “Ottonian”, which denotes “belonging to Otto”. There is no such thing as the “Middle Eastern Ottoman Empire”, that is simply a theatrical invention, the Middle East never had an Empire, nor even a true historical history, the Middle Eastern his-story was invented in Europe and transferred to the Arabs by the Europeans. The architects in Ludwig I service, Leo von Klenze and Friedrich von Gärtner designed and built Greek “Athens”. Leo von Klenze (who studied under Freidrich Gilly in Berlin and was the court Architect of Hieronymus Napoloen, the King of Westphalia) also designed and built the Walhalla Temple, the Befreiungshalle, the Bayerische Ruhmeshalle, the Munich Glyptothek, the Propyläen Tor and the Bavarian Ministry of War. It was Leo von Klenze who was the chief designer and builder of the landscape follies atop the Acropolis in Athens. He used the off-cuts and the rejected and damaged masonry from the Walhalla Temple, the building materials that could not be used in Germany because they were damaged or unusable for the Walhalla constructions specifications were carted off to Athens to be used in the construction of “ruins” to make it appear that Athens in Greece was older than Germany! Just because something is broken, does not mean it is old… But that is part of the theatrical comedy. It was an amusement to the German powers to do such a thing, seeming they had ultimate power, why not mock that power for the sense of their own amusement? If it is all a joke, why should we all not laugh at their joke. But is it funny… Does this strange sound we make when we laugh really worth the effort of all this theatrical folly, in praise of folly…Is such constant praise amusing or just tiresome antics conceived to alleviate the crushing boredom of a privileged life.?The fact is, that the Parthenon in Athens is modeled on the Walhalla near Regensburg! The Greek language was invented in the linguistic departments of German Universities. But there is a economic reason for this fakery, for these dubious “restored” ruins that the Germans have constructed in Greece, (and Rome and around the world), there is a capitalistic motivation, and that is the profitable business of selling marble and stone that is damaged and broken and is not good enough for real architectural and engineering works, the broken and damaged stones and marbles can be used for “ruins”, and therefore they can be made profitable! Also in the sculptural arts, if a marble sculpture suddenly cracked or broke, as frequently happens when working with marble, and say, for example, a nose is broken off or an arm, or some part of the sculpture is damaged, then the sculptor could sell the damaged piece to the Architectural museums who would label it as “ancient” and place it in a museum and charge the public a fee to view it, this would end up more profitable than if the statue was made and executed perfectly…No doubt the German Jews were at the coal-face of this lucrative trade in damaged goods, turning the stones that were rejected into the chief head-stones of Archaeology! Also in stone and marble quarries there is high-grade and low-grade stones and marbles, for the low-grade marble and stone blocks that are not suitable for construction of true architecture the inferior blocks can be used for “ruins”, in fact they are perfect for ruins because they are inferior and low grade, their cracks and chips and decayed forms are ideal for the romantic state of decaying ruins. There is an enormous waste in the quarrying of marble and stones, and therefore there is, correspondingly, due to economic factors, an enormous amount of fake ruins. The simple way to hide this dubious practice, and to hide its profitability, is to call the quarry waste used for building ruins – “ancient”. They are not valueless broken bits of useless stone, they are highly prized and very valuable broken bits of useful stone, simply because they can be labelled “very old”. And expert labour costs can be thus reduced, there is no need for professional stone masons and cutters, one can just used unskilled labour and dump the broken bits of quarried stone and marble anywhere, and just say the magic word – “ancient”. This has become a very profitable business for both companies, States and individuals. And indeed, a stone or marble quarry could not be profitable without this secret trade. On the occasion of the laying of the foundation stone of Walhalla, King Ludwig declared: “May Walhalla promote the strengthening and the growth of German consciousness. May all Germans, to whatever tribe they may belong, always feel that they have a common fatherland, a fatherland of which they may be proud. And may each contribute as much as he can to its glory.” (National Monuments and Nationalism in 19th Century Germany. Hans A. Pohlsander). Well, let us see the truth of how he lied, let us see what pride is here, let us be witness to the sins of the fatherland.