Nietzsche shamelessly boasted that Goethe, Shakespeare and Plato were not fit to carry the bags of his Zarathustra. Nietzsche boasted that his philosophical giant – Zarathustra, was so far above all previous philosophers that they were mere mice compared to him, or something along those lines. To denigrate those that the Jew copies from is a typical characteristic of the Jew and a characteristic of Nietzsche. One does not have to look too hard to find in Nietzsche’s work a mosaic of copied and plagiarized material and this includes where another’s work is put forward and the opposite view is taken by Nietzsche, negation it is called. If negation to others work is constant and repetitive it will eventually come to the low standard of a tabloid press, it’s not difficult to lower yourself to mere negation. Goethe would say that the Spirit of Negation is an essential characteristic of the Jew, criticism and negation are the standard tools of the journalist, and Nietzsche, is really, when compared with the German literary circles and intellectuals of the time and previously, a writer of low quality, he is at a Newspaper standard, a journalist with commercial instincts, hence the many catchy slogans, sensationalist titles and bombastic tabloidism! Which has become more appealing over time as the literary standards have lowered.
let us look at an example: “All that the good call evil must come together that one truth may be born: Oh my brothers, are you too evil enough for this truth?” – Thus spoke Zarathustra
Firstly, like most of Nietzsche’s writing, it does not make sense…What has happened is Nietzsche has mutilated a Platonic theory. He has taken a theory and attempted to make it, in a journalistic tabloid way, more sensational. He has made it more crude and made it more appealing to what was in Nietzsche’s time would have been considered low-brow or proletarian semi-literate level, and therefore Nietzsche does not have to get the theory correct, that was all to be sorted out later with Jewish publishing techniques which can convince the general reading market of anything they want. So, Nietzsche, as the Protocols indicate, was to be promoted no matter how bad his writing was.
Here is the Platonic theory that Nietzsche has mutilated: “Plato taught that Unity must include an opposite otherwise the Unity would not even be aware that it is a Unity. In Nature, multiplicity belongs to organic life, or as Goethe said – ‘A counter-King is an advantage to me, now I feel for the first time that I am king.’ – Faust.” That quote from Faust being the poetical version of the philosophical theory. It makes much more sense than Nietzsche’s mutilation.
Directly after his literary theft here, Nietzsche actually states that the law of “Thou shalt not steal” should be broken! But the way in which he means it, or demonstrates his theft, is in a very petty manner, where he is just stealing somebody else’s work and mutilating it and then trying to fob it off as his own, while denigrating the original. And again; “shatter the law tables” is not an idea that Nietzsche has come up it with himself, it’s simply old Moses breaking the law tablets, and there is nothing revolutionary about that literary image making.
One of the worst cases of Nietzsche’s plagiarism is in Thus Spoke Zarathustra’s – “The Night Song”, which is a beautiful piece of writing and was obviously not composed by Nietzsche. “The Night Song” is too good a literary style for Nietzsche, its stands out as a diamond amongst the piles of garbage in Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. And in fact, like something out of a Poe novel, Nietzsche actually condemns himself by leaving a clue to his crime, as if he just can’t help but be identified as the fraudster! I must admit he does this a lot, but it is never so obvious as it is with “The Night Song”…Nietzsche would have hated this lyrical poetry, with its melancholic refrain and rhythm. He would have hated “The Night Song”, and perhaps he added it in under advice, certainly commercially it was a canny inclusion, it is a beautiful poem, and it is probably the main reason that most Aryans would fall under the spell of Zarathustra, because Aryans are attracted by beauty, to a fault in terrestrial terms, often ignoring the dangers and poisons in their attraction and pursuit of beauty, and Nietzsche would have known this, the Jewish instinct knows this. Now in Ecce Homo, Nietzsche refers to “The Night Song” as Dionysian, and one cannot make this mistake, especially a man of Nietzsche’s erudition. “The Night Song” is Apollonian, it’s an Ode to Apollo, probably anonymous, but obviously Nietzsche has copied, this time word for word, an Ode to Apollo. Nietzsche constantly opposes Dionysus with Apollo, and explains Dionysus to represent chaotic, intoxicated darkness and Apollo to represent light and order, with Nietzsche always adoring the former, Nietzsche’s god is always Dionysus, that goes without saying, and yet Nietzsche’s Zarathustra sings an Apollonian song! Luciferian! Nietzsche hates the Luciferian! In “The Night Song” the light-bringer laments of his great loneliness after him having been divided from his primal darkness; the nostalgia of a sun, a brightly burning star – “O the solitude of all givers! O the silence of all beacons”….Beautiful Aryan poetry, not written by Nietzsche, and he admits it, actually leaving a clue that leads to him – the fraudster! For Nietzsche to refer to “The Night Song” as being Dionsyian, when it is clearly not, but it is Apollonian, is Nietzsche identifying himself as the literary thief! Because the real writer could not make that mistake, it has to be deliberate. And when it comes to literary theft, Nietzsche had the character for it, as he often boasts he had, and he had the ambition to do so, and most importantly he had the opportunity to do so.
I will end Part II with some more Nietzschean “philosophy”: “This, is however my teaching: He who wants to learn to fly one day must first learn to stand and to walk and to run and to climb and to dance – you cannot learn to fly by flying!” – Thus Spoke Zarathustra
Possibly the dumbest thing I ever read….He’s joking of course, well, he wasn’t drunk at that time because Nietzsche did not drink, so basically he is saying, and I will put in proletarian terms, in a tabloid manner, “I could write any old shit and you morons will praise it, because you were fucking told to.” Nietzsche badgering his dumb readers.