Question: Nietzsche, like the Tribe’s “Holy” Book has just enough Aryan idealism and aspirations to sucker in the Goyim, amongst all the contradictions and malevolent psy-ops to confuse us?
Answer: Yes, indeed. Houston Stewart Chamberlain, a contemporary of Nietzsche, and who knew of him personally and was a man who was part of the House of Wagner. H.S. Chamberlain, perhaps it could also be said – the greatest bi-lingual writer in the world at the time. H.S. Chamberlain was totally dismissive of Nietzsche, as if he was beneath contempt: “…as for Nietzsche, from the beginning the evil spirit was stronger than the good one…Nietzsche was a man without any spiritual initiatives…I bet that in the entire Nietzsche not one single sentence, not a fragment of a sentence, let alone a thought or any constructive idea can be found, of which the author can’t be traced: Wagner, Plato, Simonides, Schopenhauer, Goethe – the Übermensch is from Faust.”
One could add any number of writers to this list. There are just a plethora of literary sources from which Nietzsche has copied and then pasted together in a mosaic style, a tabloid style, a common publishing method. Type casting, indeed the alphabet itself is based on this mechanical method of movable type – it is not only the method used to print the Bible but also to print Nietzsche books. The dates are always moved around also, so one never knows when something was actually published and printed, especially with works over a 100 years old, and the older the books are the more likely they have had the publishing dates shifted, publishing is totally corrupt and anachronistic in nature. Lucian, Herder, Novalis, Muller, Heine, Leibniz, Heraclitus, etc, can all be found in Nietzsche, in the fragmentary form, mutilated, chopped up and rearranged, not even making any sense most of the time. Then this is all mixed up with tabloid pieces, newspaper articles, common idioms of the day, journals, periodicals, university theses and so on, probably literary material that was just the fragmentary notes of the authors that were copied, or rejected pieces…It would be a cheap option to collect all the literary cast offs and rejected bits and pieces and then form then into a book of fragmentary aphorisms and then pass it off as Philosophy for the masses.
One can find examples of where Nietzsche, or whomever was producing the “Nietzsche” books, has copied fragments of the New Testament. Literary cast offs or fragments are bits and pieces of literary material that has been thrown out or not included in the final text, because it was cut out by the editor, or rejected, or just thrown away because it was in error, or did not fit the format of the book. As the old saying goes, “most of material ends up on the cutting room floor”.
“You should honour even the enemy in your friend. Can you go near to your friend without going over to him? In your friend you should possess your best enemy. Your heart should feel closest to him when you oppose him.” – Of the Friend – Thus Spoke Zarathustra
This would be an example of what normally would end up on the cutting room floor, it’s rubbish. Initially it has come from the Gospels, written in the Middle Ages, and rejected from the “Holy Bible” – Matthew – 5:43-45. Sayings of the “Jesus” character, which can also be found in the doctrines of Neoplatonism or Heraclitus, or Hegel – Coincidentia Oppsitorum – The Unity of Opposites, which is a dialectic, a literary device! Unity of opposites is a prime category of the dialectics of the Bible or Nietzsche, as it is for most written material. Human thought has a natural tendency towards contradictions. But in Nietzsche’s case the example is not even correct, its a clumsy version, in error in fact, in literary terms it would have to be re-written or thrown in the waste paper basket. The New Testament version is a much better literary example of the concept of Coincidentia Oppsitorum. Nietzsche then contrasts it again with Bible criticism, more fragments, fragments contradicting fragments, fragmentary Polemics!
“My brothers, I do not exhort you to love your neighbour: I exhort you to love the most distant.” – Thus Spoke Zarathustra
An example of Polemics, where you give a literary source, in this case a fragment from the New Testament and then make a controversial debate out of it by going the opposite!
A Kamerad emailed me with some sensible questions regarding my Nietzsche posts. So I will answer the questions here:
Question – In one of your articles you mentioned that the Protocols had listed Nietzsche along with Darwin and Marx as key subversives. I’ve never read before that Nietzsche was Jewish?
Answer – Yes, that is right, Nietzsche is mentioned along with Darwin and Marx as being key subversives in their agenda. The Protocols also say that they arrange publication and promotion on racial lines. Certain men are promoted over others due to their racial makeup, which is often a secret, indeed they are promoted if they are part of “the tribe”. The difficulty of course is of telling who is in the tribe and who is not, that is something ultimately only known by the secret Rabbis. Jews have proven themselves experts in disguising themselves. What these men share, despite the huge publication and promotional Capital resources that have been invested in them, is anti-Christian doctrines and totally Material doctrines focused primarily on the study of Nature as a dominant Force, and a final submission to this dominant material temporal Force; “I draw conclusion that by the law of Nature, right lies in force.” – The Protocols. That is true, any man of worldly experience can acknowledge that, it is true. But the Aryan refuses to submit to that Law, whereas the Jew – Darwin, Marx and Nietzsche, not only endorse this but celebrate and finally submit themselves totally to it, which is Jewish; submission to the Law enforced by their Geomantic Lord of Hosts – Jehovah. The fact that Darwin, Marx and Nietzsche may be dissimilar on many literary points is indifferent, dissimulation in literature is ubiquitous, especially in Jewish promoted literature, Nietzsche’s “philosophy” is a perfect example of this, with its pastiche of contradictory aphorisms, a mosaic arrangement of contradictory assertions and negations. Indeed one can extend this to the economic realm where the contradictory arrangements of Capitalism and Communism are set side by side by the same hand which settles in figures only, numerical figures.
Nietzsche’s best friends were Jewish, Lou Andreas-Salome and Paul Ree. Nietzsche reproached Wagner for his anti-Semitism. Nietzsche, from a wealthy family himself, considered himself to be a Polish Aristocrat, which is to say, in those days, anti-German, certainly Nietzsche is critical of Germans in every chance he gets, but seems favourable in a sentimental way to Judaism and the Jews, indeed Nietzsche refers to his “Shadow” as the “Wandering Jew”, but then immediately denies it, in typical Nietzsche fashion! He is definitely a slimy little fish to get a hold of. Nietzsche, as pointed out by Houston Stewart Chamberlain, borrowed and plagiarized all his writings, but then Nietzsche criticizes all those he borrowed from or ignores them, this type of behaviour is typically Jewish. Also, could not Nietzsche’s literary style, so loved by Jews, the world over, be described as essentially Jewish? Do you know what the word “Chutzpah” means? If a Rabbi was to write the meaning of Chutzpah he would write something like “beyond good and evil”, because Chutzpah is literally brazen, audacious outlandish behaviour , completely immoral; that switches everything, turns everything upside down and the wrong way about, confuses with a confidence rarely seen, for example a description of Chutzpah is “that quality in a man who, having killed his mother and father, throws himself on the mercy of the court because he is an orphan.” A denial of any wrong-doing, lack of conscience, a lack of awareness of responsibility, there is no awareness of wrong-doing. Chutzpah could also be described as a Great Swindle, a con-job, an audacious scam. In Nietzsche, everything is the wrong way about, and it all leads to nowhere, there is just an empty, shallow and a chameleon quality to it in the end, like someone is putting on an act.
“Go to thy woman with a whip.” – Nietzsche. But here Nietzsche is pretending to be whipped in a mocked stage scene. It’s all so essentially Jewish behaviour, here Nietzsche is depicted as donkey being whipped, as slave, and yet his “Philosophy” is the total opposite, supposedly the Aristocratic Warrior Overman to whom women are nothing but producers of children, which is of course the anti-feminine Judaic outlook on women. Nietzsche’s views, concerning women, in his books, are inline with a Rabbi’s views on women….Except Nietzsche appears to be somewhat confused, or as I have already stated, Nietzsche is not the writer of “Nietzsche” books?
The New Race
by Baldur von Schirach
Never served yet we are Soldiers,
we have never fought a real War,
a war of bullets and grenades.
And yet we know battles and victories-
no, not a war such as our scars suggest,
and yet it was War! For many, many have died…
We are all free, yet now we see in Service
more Freedom than in personal demands.
We sit at desks, we stand by our machines,
Hundreds of thousands with one Soul.
We are the heretics, we are the deeply pious,
of today, of yesterday, and what Cometh.
Excerpt from the upcoming release of Songs Of The Reich, to be released for the first time here on Siddharreich, on Fuhrertag – 20th April 2016. This is the poetical book that the Torch Bearers have created to present to the Ehreans of this world, to inspire them and unify them; through poetry, poetry previously untranslated from the Third Reich, poetry that would have remained untranslated without our collaborative efforts, and poetry from the post-War period all the way up to the present day, following a divine thin Golden Line, as if hands rising together from distant fields reached out all at once, from those whom have fallen so far from the Fatherland, their Loyalty still rises like towers above the barren wastelands of this tormented earth. We may be dispersed, we may be lost, but our silent songs of great longing echo around the earth as the swinging branches of dying oaks move to nocturnal breaths.
The Final Journey by Kamerad Brian
Ultra luminous eyes stare unblinkingly, as the translucent electric blue body emerges from the organic machine which has held it captive for however long…..The face stares up, straight up, toward its final destination, its ultimate goal. Slowly the being pulls itself free of the lifeless prison that was once its ‘Living’ cell, incarcerated like a monkey in a zoo. It takes a huge amount of ethereric energy for the astral to completely separate itself from the fake origin, but this being has the strength of 100 men, and the insight of 1,000,000.
Upon separation, the Hyperborean floats for a few seconds, as if bidding farewell to the mechanical, technotronic prison which it has known as ‘Home’ for what seems like seconds now.
Now the journey begins, back to the source. Through endless emerald ether, onwards toward true Home, the Centre of all Things, the galactic Swastika – Heart of the Universe!