Racial Sin

“Miscegenation is almost always “racial sin”. Nothing good comes of it in the long run or short term. This has been simultaneous with the involution of the Earth, with the becoming of the Darkest Age, which the Hindus called Kali-Yuga, Age, Age of the Goddess Kali, the Destroyer herself, and which the Greeks called the Age of Iron and of Dionysus (Shiva). The ancient Germans called it the Age of the Wolf, devourer of Wotan. When Hitler attempted to return the world to the Golden Age, the Satya-Yuga, or Kryta-Yuga, to the resurrection of the Gods, Wotan, Polar Hyperborea, it is right that as a parallel he attempted the regeneration of the Nordic Race as the necessary vehicle able to receive and express the resurrected God. It was an ideal that was dreamt about, because the Germanic Race was also not pure. That is why one spoke about the “Aryan Race”, ancient Sanskrit term that means “twice born” or “reborn”. Which is to say, the “initiated”, those born again after initiatic “mystic death”. This leads us to believe that Esoteric Hitlerism could think that the superior race is not absolutely physical, like the one today, since neither was that of Hyperborea.” – Adolf Hitler: The Ultimate Avatar

“Most of the world is now lost in an animality with no return. And the truth is this is no longer preoccupies the Avatar. The number of heroes that were with Him has almost been fulfilled by Destiny. They are already no longer here, they have gone away. Only the few prisoners who can still free themselves matter. And they have to overcome the cultural miscegenation, with a supreme effort aided by the greatest purity of their luminous blood and their spiritual race: That of the re-born, the twice born. Because Will depends on the spiritual race and blood, not on the biological blood and biological race. In the most critical moment of the Initiatic Drama of Return, what counts is the spirit….The non-esoteric Hitlerism and political National Socialism of the thirties, until 1945, had to encourage, as we said, the birth and physical procreation of the Aryan race, as a means of providing terrestrial bodies for this race, avoiding the possibility of a mental procreation, for which almost no-one was yet prepared. They thereby intended to combat miscegenation and the coloured peoples of the Demiurge in the extended “vital space” of the Aryan race, towards the East. Attempting, by this equivocal means, a method of shaping for the Aesir. For their entry into this land. But this changed after 1945.”  –  MANU: “For The Man To Come”

The position of Esoteric Hitlerism regards miscegenation is that it is “racial sin”, going back to the first “racial sin” when the White Hyperborean Gods mixed with the daughters of man and thus became lost due to a catastrophic error. Hitler and the Third Reich attempted to reverse this tragic involution and degeneration. They had the power to do so, and they attempted to do so. To what level they achieved their racial purification is not known. What is known is that with the terrestrial destruction of Germany and the Third Reich, humanity fell further and further into involution and degeneration through an ever increasing miscegenation and mullatoism…It is too late to reverse the involution now, too late for humanity, the individual man can however be salvaged through the Etherealization of his blood – a spiritual and inward process, reversing the flawed propagation of the sinful flesh…Man can become pregnant with his own “Son of Death”, with death Itself overcoming the gross error of life. The pure Hyperborean Race was always pure through Divinity, being above this world, the Devil drives the ferment of miscegenation and racial sin, thus opposing the work of the Divine Ones. The possibility of regaining lost divinity is worth Total Kampf against the World, the propagation of the flesh is now rendered meaningless in our Greater Quest of Transmigration of the Spirit.


Heil Hitler!

Paris Attacks?

There were no attacks on Paris, nobody died, there were no terrorists. There were shots fired and some explosions by gun and ammunition corporations and this was shown on television and written about in newspapers and on the internet, and now I am writing about it, which suits their cause also. “The world is a stage”….Most of the images shown today on television have been recorded before, months ago, years ago, they show them now as “proof”, they are just some images from thousands of images pre-recorded, images waiting to be shown to the masses. The problem is that I am not from the masses, that is the problem, that has always been the problem, the masses are the masses and that is constant and unchanging, they accept whatever they are shown, I do not. The fact that I am in the masses and yet I do not accept what I am shown is my problem, it is not the problem of the masses. The masses are unchanging, I change, that is the difference. We wrote in our latest book that we are transformers, that we change, that is because we are conscious, the masses are not conscious, they are robots. The robots are programmed to accept and project an illusion, they all contribute to this illusion that we the conscious see, the illusion is not real to us because reality is an illusion. This is nothing new but has been happening for thousands of years. As our consciousness increases so do the illusions. Very few will understand this…In fact I have an actual number for how many will understand this and it is very few. The illusions are not produced for my sake they are produced for the masses, there is no comprehension that I could exist in the masses. It is an impossibility.  There is no consciousness of the images, the images are manufactured by a Super Computer – see “Third Reich Pilgrim”. The Super Computer – “The Digital Messiah”, see Serrano, is now producing the images. The Super Computer has been programmed to produce that which is known to it; a cycle, but ever diluting, of cyclic images reducing. Eventually, given enough time, the images will end, but they increase in number because their potency reduces. Tigers decrease in number but cane-toads increase. Energy dissipates, it reduces, but multiplicity is the way in which nature achieves it’s end of dilution. Nature dilutes and dissipates. So the Digital Messiah increases its false images, multiplying them with less and less effect, falsity and therefore ugliness increase exponentially in this false world and this cannot be stopped. Explosion will increase as implosion decreases. Our way is of implosion, in opposition the world’s explosion. However the world does not want to explode, it wants to conserve what it has, therefore it feigns explosion, pretending to itself while it explodes, because it wants nothing other than to be what it is. While we want nothing other than to be what it is not. We do not want to conserve, but we want to implode into that which is not of this world. Everything we endure is towards this end of implosion into another world. I have been around a time or two and I know the way this ends, pain does not decrease the feeling of Eternity which contrasts so dramatically with life, death is the Eternity designed by us to overcome life, it is our trump card, our ace we throw down in the hole, we got them beat, I got the shadow overcoming, I got Green Lightning beating in my veins, I got a blood unseen, I got blood unknown, but to a few, only a Hyperborean Ehrean knows the feeling, invincible, a winning hand of ultimate destruction, courtship with the dead, skeleton song until the end , ceremony with the dead Nazi’s who came before me, kissing the dead in a cold sea, lost to this world, missing the ones who came before me, the smoke of my fire unseen, a warning sign to those who have never been….

Delenda contra Nietzsche. Part III

Nietzsche’s doctrine of Eternal Recurrence is not Nietzsche’s idea, he has borrowed it from where he found it, a much discussed and written about philosophical matter contemporary to him. Nietzsche heard these discussions and read books which put forward the idea and then he put his own spin on it. Nietzsche said that traces of his idea could be found in the work of the “ancient Greeks”, which is an academic code word for the Germanic Enlightenment, but that’s another story. The idea of Eternal Recurrence was fully formed by German “orientalist” scholars, university scholars hired by corporations to form certain ideas, but that is another story. I want to discuss Eternal Recurrence just on its own, as a theory and how it relates to Nietzsche, and my polemic against Nietzsche.

Nietzsche was a plagiarist and he has adopted this academic theory of Eternal Recurrence, in total contradiction to his other famous doctrine, that of “Will to Power”. Nietzsche also plagiarized Will to Power, another academic theory first articulated by Spinoza, perhaps defined best by him – Conatus. Adam Smith and Karl Marx would begin from the same philosophical basis, and a very pragmatic analysis in human terms. Nietzsche would have come across this theory often, most notably Schopenhauer’s version in “The World as Will and Representation”. With Schopenhauer, there is a blind force, that is a metaphysical will, and it is that will that dominates in phenomenal nature. Nietzsche’s theory can be seen reducing Schopenhauer’s version of Conatus to a more catchy tabloid standard, making it more understandable to the masses. In total contradiction, of course, Nietzsche is thoroughly opposed to the masses, but he only writes for them! There is nothing wrong with using and adopting and re-working, or building on, the ideas of another, there is nothing wrong with that, we all do the same thing in that sense, but Nietzsche is always claiming that his ideas are the only ideas that are revolutionary and thoroughly original, to the absurd point that he claims that Schopenhauer (a generation before Nietzsche) is merely a doppelgänger of Nietzsche: “It is not Schopenhauer as Educator but Nietzsche as Educator”, Thus says Nietzsche. The thought of the day being “Schopenhauer as Educator”, Nietzsche borrows from Schopenhauer’s philosophy and then declares, in negation, No, I am Schopenhauer! He does the same to Wagner, and Plato!

So, “Will to Power” and “Eternal Recurrence” are opposed to each other. But Nietzsche, presents in his journalistic fashion, both theories at the same time as if both were equally co-existent and not mere theories developed by many previous human thinkers. This constant contradictory representation in all Nietzsche’s writing is the best example of his plagiarism, he copies and pastes and cares not that the result is a disorderly mess! It’s tabloidism, newspaper standard, and who cares anyway, only the masses will be reading it, and they don’t care. “Only where life is, there is also will: not will to life, but – so I teach you – will to power.” – Nietzsche negating and mutilating Schopenhauer. Problem is though, more importantly, is that one cannot have both theories of Will to Power and Eternal Recurrence at the same time! Eternal Recurrence is the theory that everything returns to the same as it was, that means there is no “self overcoming” and no “will to power” because individual Will is denied in Eternal Recurrence! To deconstruct it, we can say that, will to power assumes that the individual has an individual will and that that individual will is opposed by phenomenal nature, and that the individual will seeks to overcome this, the will seeking more power as opposed to other individual wills and nature Itself which seeks to lessen the individual’s power. Nietzsche’s version of Eternal Recurrence is that he wants nothing other than what has happened to happen again, over and over, denying his own will to power! For will to power to have a basis, pragmatic or philosophical, either way one must assume linear time, cyclical time rules out individual will to power, or overcoming anything. But then again Eternal Recurrence of the same denies any change at all in anything at all, even of Time. The premise that Time is infinite is the premise of the doctrine of Eternal Recurrence, and that if Time is infinite, then this life must return eventually to its same form an infinite number of times and that would be Eternal….But that is not what Eternity is….Why? Because this world and life is NOT Eternal! The attempt to make this life seem eternal with nothing more than human semantics and rhetorical postulations ends ultimately with the failure of human reasoning. Nietzsche desires Eternal Return because he wants to live this life over and over and over again, forever…So does every Ghetto Jew, nothing new in that, problem is that their Nature is not Eternal and this World is not Eternal. For Nietzsche, pressing the replay button on his life is a philosophical way out of the fundamental dilemma posed by “The Heat Death of the Universe”…A Theory that predates Nietzsche (best articulated by Lord Kelvin)…A Theory much closer to the ultimate Truth, and a theory that Nietzsche would have been very familiar with. The ultimate fate of the Universe is not endless hitting of the replay button by Super-Unknown Entity! The Universe tends always toward entropy….I can feel the Nietzscheans already starting to lose their minds…Yes, that is the Truth of the matter, that is the way of the world. If I design to build a brick house, to give you a pragmatic empirical example: If I order the bricks for the brick house and have the bricks delivered to a plot of land, if I don’t construct those bricks into a brick house the bricks surely will not construct themselves, no matter how much Time is given to the bricks…What will happen to the bricks if I just leave them there on the plot of land and do nothing? The bricks, “over time”, will not form themselves into a brick house, if they just lie there (assuming humans don’t come by and steal them) they will eventually become a pile of rubble, and then a pile of dust, and then dust scattered by the four winds – that is called entropy! Everything tending in nature towards a diminished state. This of course destroys the fantasies of Darwinists, as well as Nietzscheans, who are usually on the same page. When the Universe can no longer convert energy it can no longer support life, or rather there is an end to the exploitation of the energy which supports life in this Universe – there is just no way out of the heat loss, no way out of the Heat Death! Such a beautiful Aryan Truth, and it sends Jews mad! Energy dissipates, that is it…Eventually all motion ceases, eventually this Universe will stop. The Demonic Machine of the Demiurge has an End! And this is the thought that sends Nietzsche insane, realizing that his “will to power” and “eternal recurrence” offer no challenge to the Aryan fundamental Truth of Entropy and the Heat Death of this Universe.

Poetry break

I am a wreck,

I am unprotected,

I am parted from you,

I am departed from the star I once knew,

I can’t replace you,

I only see something black and blue.

Oh my baby, I can’t replace you,

Oh baby, my eyes are closed,

My bones are broken and muscles torn,

Remembering when we were two.

This Vimana won’t fly

My Vimana won’t ever fly without you.

Been around and around again,

Over mountains, across seas,

To Gerda once again.

This Vimana won’t fly

My Vimana won’t ever fly without you

This knowledge is without change,

I can’t change without you,

Baby I once knew you,

Before I was born we were two,

You don’t remember but I do,

When we were two.

Been to extremes, broke bars,

I smashed stars, crashed cars,

And now I am all scars, my baby.

Baby remember my Vimana

My Vimana won’t fly

My Vimana won’t ever fly without you.

Lying low, secluded, alone again,

These amores tear at my heart,

When we are together, when we are apart,

Can’t replace what I have stolen,

With ghosts from a dream kingdom,

These amores, these statues, these words,

Dead to me, without you,

My Vimana won’t fly

My Vimana won’t ever fly again without you.

Delenda contra Nietzsche, Part II

Nietzsche shamelessly boasted that Goethe, Shakespeare and Plato were not fit to carry the bags of his Zarathustra. Nietzsche boasted that his philosophical giant – Zarathustra, was so far above all previous philosophers that they were mere mice compared to him, or something along those lines. To denigrate those that the Jew copies from is a typical characteristic of the Jew and a characteristic of Nietzsche. One does not have to look too hard to find in Nietzsche’s work a mosaic of copied and plagiarized material and this includes where another’s work is put forward and the opposite view is taken by Nietzsche, negation it is called. If negation to others work is constant and repetitive it will eventually come to the low standard of a tabloid press, it’s not difficult to lower yourself to mere negation. Goethe would say that the Spirit of Negation is an essential characteristic of the Jew, criticism and negation are the standard tools of the journalist, and Nietzsche, is really, when compared with the German literary circles and intellectuals of the time and previously, a writer of low quality, he is at a Newspaper standard, a journalist with commercial instincts, hence the many catchy slogans, sensationalist titles and bombastic tabloidism! Which has become more appealing over time as the literary standards have lowered.

let us look at an example: “All that the good call evil must come together that one truth may be born: Oh my brothers, are you too evil enough for this truth?” – Thus spoke Zarathustra

Firstly, like most of Nietzsche’s writing, it does not make sense…What has happened is Nietzsche has mutilated a Platonic theory. He has taken a theory and attempted to make it, in a journalistic tabloid way, more sensational. He has made it more crude and made it more appealing to what was in Nietzsche’s time would have been considered low-brow or proletarian semi-literate level, and therefore Nietzsche does not have to get the theory correct, that was all to be sorted out later with Jewish publishing techniques which can convince the general reading market of anything they want. So, Nietzsche, as the Protocols indicate, was to be promoted no matter how bad his writing was.

Here is the Platonic theory that Nietzsche has mutilated: “Plato taught that Unity must include an opposite otherwise the Unity would not even be aware that it is a Unity. In Nature, multiplicity belongs to organic life, or as Goethe said – ‘A counter-King is an advantage to me, now I feel for the first time that I am king.’ – Faust.” That quote from Faust being the poetical version of the philosophical theory. It makes much more sense than Nietzsche’s mutilation.

Directly after his literary theft here, Nietzsche actually states that the law of “Thou shalt not steal” should be broken! But the way in which he means it, or demonstrates his theft, is in a very petty manner, where he is just stealing somebody else’s work and mutilating it and then trying to fob it off as his own, while denigrating the original. And again; “shatter the law tables” is not an idea that Nietzsche has come up it with himself, it’s simply old Moses breaking the law tablets, and there is nothing revolutionary about that literary image making.

One of the worst cases of Nietzsche’s plagiarism is in Thus Spoke Zarathustra’s – “The Night Song”, which is a beautiful piece of writing and was obviously not composed by Nietzsche. “The Night Song” is too good a literary style for Nietzsche, its stands out as a diamond amongst the piles of garbage in Nietzsche’s Zarathustra. And in fact, like something out of a Poe novel, Nietzsche actually condemns himself by leaving a clue to his crime, as if he just can’t help but be identified as the fraudster! I must admit he does this a lot, but it is never so obvious as it is with “The Night Song”…Nietzsche would have hated this lyrical poetry, with its melancholic refrain and rhythm. He would have hated “The Night Song”, and perhaps he added it in under advice, certainly commercially it was a canny inclusion, it is a beautiful poem, and it is probably the main reason that most Aryans would fall under the spell of Zarathustra, because Aryans are attracted by beauty, to a fault in terrestrial terms, often ignoring the dangers and poisons in their attraction and pursuit of beauty, and Nietzsche would have known this, the Jewish instinct knows this. Now in Ecce Homo, Nietzsche refers to “The Night Song” as Dionysian, and one cannot make this mistake, especially a man of Nietzsche’s erudition. “The Night Song” is Apollonian, it’s an Ode to Apollo, probably anonymous, but obviously Nietzsche has copied, this time word for word, an Ode to Apollo. Nietzsche constantly opposes Dionysus with Apollo, and explains Dionysus to represent chaotic, intoxicated darkness and Apollo to represent light and order, with Nietzsche always adoring the former, Nietzsche’s god is always Dionysus, that goes without saying, and yet Nietzsche’s Zarathustra sings an Apollonian song! Luciferian! Nietzsche hates the Luciferian! In “The Night Song” the light-bringer laments of his great loneliness after him having been divided from his primal darkness; the nostalgia of a sun, a brightly burning star – “O the solitude of all givers! O the silence of all beacons”….Beautiful Aryan poetry, not written by Nietzsche, and he admits it, actually leaving a clue that leads to him – the fraudster! For Nietzsche to refer to “The Night Song” as being Dionsyian, when it is clearly not, but it is Apollonian, is Nietzsche identifying himself as the literary thief! Because the real writer could not make that mistake, it has to be deliberate. And when it comes to literary theft, Nietzsche had the character for it, as he often boasts he had, and he had the ambition to do so, and most importantly he had the opportunity to do so.

I will end Part II with some more Nietzschean “philosophy”: “This, is however my teaching: He who wants to learn to fly one day must first learn to stand and to walk and to run and to climb and to dance – you cannot learn to fly by flying!” – Thus Spoke Zarathustra

Possibly the dumbest thing I ever read….He’s joking of course, well, he wasn’t drunk at that time because Nietzsche did not drink, so basically he is saying, and I will put in proletarian terms, in a tabloid manner, “I could write any old shit and you morons will praise it, because you were fucking told to.” Nietzsche badgering his dumb readers.

Delenda contra Nietzsche. Part I

“My formula for greatness in man is amor fati: the fact that a man wishes nothing to be different, either in front of him or behind him, for all eternity. Not only must the necessary be borne, and on no account concealed, – all idealism is falsehood in the face of necessity, – but it must also be loved.” – Nietzsche, Ecce Homo.

This is of course mere copying of the Latin phrase amor fati – “love of fate”. There is nothing original in Nietzsche’s writing, like Houstan Stewart Chamberlain pointed out, Nietzsche never had one original idea of his own, he borrowed and stole everything, which is why his god is Dionysus.

What does the Wagnerian, Adolf Hitler, write about idealism: “Were it not for idealism, all faculties of the intellect, even the most brilliant, would be nothing but intellect itself, a mere external phenomenon without inner value, and never a creative force….Without being conscious of it, the purest idealism is always associated with the most profound knowledge.”  –  Mein Kampf. In every instant Hitler can be contrasted with Nietzsche, one is Aryan and one is Jewish. The Aryan is discerned by his idealism, but the Jew is discerned by his distinct lack of idealism. Serrano would say that the Jew has a purely rational intellect, and that the Jew is simply devoid of all self-sacrificing sentiments. And Hitler would say that it is only with Aryan self-sacrifice that the world receives a creative force. Again Nietzsche has no creative force, he borrows from what he finds, like Dionysus was originally a thief, and Dionysus, the bibulous cynic, is Nietzsche’s god. This constant adoration of the mythological deity of Dionysus is a total dissimulation because Nietzsche is an atheist, how typically Jewish.

Hitler describes the Jew as having a “tenacious will-to-survive”. I would say the same, the Jew has a remarkable will to self-preservation, to the conservation of its self. Nietzsche would call this “will to power”, not his own idea, it is just the natural Jewish instinct, one can see it everywhere in action.

“I cannot remember ever having exerted myself, I can point to no trace of struggle (kampf) in my life; I am the reverse of a heroic nature.”  –  Nietzsche, Ecce Homo

Sometimes the Jew with his rational intellect can be very accurate in self analysis, like Nietzsche is here, very frank, blunt. I would contrast this, Nietzsche’s disclosure in Ecce Homo, with all of Hitler’s Mein Kampf! And what more can I add? Hitler and Nietzsche, even when Nietzsche is being candid, are opposed on everything!

Nietzsche has no concept of the “after-life”, no concept of the “Beyond”, no concept of the “soul”, no concept of “truth”, no concept of “eternal life”. He scoffs at the like, referring to such values as nonsense, Nietzsche condemns such values. “All those things which mankind has valued with such earnestness heretofore are not even real; they are mere creations of fancy, or, more strictly speaking, lies born of evil instincts of diseased and, in the deepest sense noxious natures – all concepts, “God, “soul”, “virtue”, “sin”, “Beyond”, “truth, “eternal life”…But the greatness of human nature, its “divinity”, was sought for in them.”  –   Nietzsche, Ecce Homo.

I am quoting Ecce Homo (Behold the Man), because Nietzsche is revealing himself in autobiographical form. Ecce Homo, the title, is of course borrowed from the Latin Bible! Ecce Homo is the Christ, Sacrificed! Nietzsche does not believe in the self sacrifice of divinity, but he has no qualms about using the terms ascribed to it for his own contradictory cause, which is the very definition of dissimulation, which is the very nature of the Jew. But Hitler wrote that self sacrifice, and belief in divinity, belief in an afterlife, belief in the immortality of the Aryan soul, are fundamental beliefs of the Aryan. In contrast to the Jew who believes all such things to be nonsense. The Jew does not believe in a Judgement either, and therefore believes that morals are nonsense. Nietzsche writes: “I obey my Dionysian nature, which knows not how to separate the negative deed from the saying of yea. I am the first immoralist, and in this sense I am essentially the annihilator.” –  Ecce Homo. He is not the first immoralist though, that’s just boasting, chutzpah, Nietzsche, thoroughly immoral, is not the first immoralist. For Nietzsche the spirit of Negation and annihilation are inseparable from “yea-saying life”, which is of course a contradiction. But Nietzsche is always consistently contradictory, which makes challenging him very difficult, and its the reason why he has got away with what he has for so long….This is why Nietzsche can say “we Argonauts of the ideal”, or “we free spirits” without any consciousness that this is in total contradiction to his entire so called “philosophy”.

“The Germans have not the faintest idea of how vulgar they are – but this in itself is the acme of vulgarity, they are not even ashamed of being merely Germans. They will have their say in everything, they regard themselves as fit to decide all questions; I fear that they have decided about me. My whole life is essentially a proof of this remark. In vain have I sought among them for a sign of tact and delicacy towards myself. Among the Jews I did indeed find it, but not among the Germans.” –  Nietzsche, Ecce Homo

Nietzsche seeks company amongst Jews, rightly so, they are of his same nature, and he states it in no uncertain terms.

And with that I will end Part I of my polemic against Nietzsche.

The Forsaken Few

By Kamerad Dan


I belong to a small cadre of initiates. Some still belong to this world, most do not. Admittedly, the stuff I write here is not popular, it has very little meaning outside a small circle of people. It is, as I have said in the past, the forgotten wisdom of the forsaken few. Those who understand its importance don’t intellectually grasp it, they intuitively feel it. The human intellect sees only a very tiny portion of reality, its basest part.

A few years ago, when writing publically was an obsession of mine, I did not like or appreciate criticism of any kind. These days I simply don’t care about my ideas being criticized or even if they are accepted by the roughly 100-200 people a day that read them. Out of these I suspect only 2 or 3 have any real use for them. I am not complaining about it, I am simply making an observation. The old perceptions of existence that were put into tidy cosmological boxes mean nothing to me now. Truth is conveyed far better by analogies and even myths, that’s how it has always been. This is why myths last for ages.

While many writers on these topis feign esoteric knowledge, 99% of them have never been truly initiated. Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, and OTO don’t count. Most of these perpetrators read books they buy from Amazon, they spew out what they have read or seen on Youtube, and suddenly they are professors at Hogwarts. I don’t buy any of it and neither should you. I have read such terrible advice given by esoteric internet scholars over the years that I am shocked that more poor souls haven’t killed themselves. I am still trying to figure out if this “internet” thing is a blessing or a curse. I lean toward the latter.

I believe that I am strange, even awkward when it comes to how my personality functions and develops in this domain. I have always been strange in this manner. When I was young I was overly-sensitive to things going on around me. This often caused me to be very violent when someone got in my way. At one point I was looking at very serious prison time for a violent encounter that occurred when I became a legal adult. This made me seek out people and ideas that were different, and even somewhat extreme.

Even now I am an admirer of what people would think strange. I admire Miguel Serrano and believe his work represents a powerful initiatic current of extreme importance. I was friends with Bruce Carroll Pierce who I considered my personal mentor shortly before his death in 2010. On a stranger note still, I believe that there is a race of Aryans living outside of space and time who have completed the journey of divine individuation and are immortal emissaries who are greater than the capricious gods of the past. These Aryans (sometimes called Nordics) are in many cases piloting UFO’s and will communicate with certain people. To boot, I see in ancient paganism as well as in Christianity, the story of dying to mundane human life, overcoming it, and resurrection into godhead. This is also the story of Mithraism and the meaning behind its symbolism. This is the very crux of all initiation. I still believe that the only valid path is necessarily an extreme one. All else is just pretend. An old friend once told me that if you are not a wild-eyed zealot for what you believe in then what’s the sense in believing in anything?

These sorts of things do not fly today in modern society because people believe what the social currents tell them to believe. I challenge you to ask a person what initiation is and watch the blank stare these dead people give you. All that was great has been largely forgotten by dying humanity. Evil is now good and good is now evil. It no longer amazes me that an inversion of truth has taken place. I do not nor have I ever belonged to this world or the currents that course through it. For this reason it always felt natural for me to be contrary to everything that was “modern” and common. Even hipster religions like discordianism, neognosticism and synchro-mysticism represent “this world” currents. They are as worthless as any religion out there.

recently I was engaged in a conversation with a small group of people. A friend of mine brought up flat earth research. Inside this small group was a Christian man who one could rightly say is a “fundamentalist”. As the conversation went on I could see him growing agitated. When I asked him if he was ok, he began to visibly shake and get upset at the very thought that people could be lied to on such a massive scale. I simply added that the Bible teaches flat earth and a firmament upon which are the “waters above”. It was simply too much for him to handle. Human beings are fundamentally trapped in this world whether they believe or not. Most of them are going to die here and never escape because their ideas bind them so securely to the earth. They cannot entertain the possibility that Adolf Hitler was possibly the “good guy” or that NASA has lied to us, or even that there is much more to the human individual than blood and marrow.

It is easy for a person to claim they are free when they have never actually experienced freedom. Today people are quite careless with words, especially in America which is filled to the brim with arrogant, narcissistic know-it-alls. If you are uninitiated and have been born in the last 90 years, you don’t know freedom. Now when I use terms like “Aryan God” I do not mean this in any anthropomorphic way. The Aryan God of Infinity is that ultimate living freedom, a freedom we cannot know until we learn to break out of the intellectual traps that have been set for the modern mind. These traps don’t just kill you once, they murder you twice. First they take your body, then your soul.

Jacob Boehme, Carl Jung, and particularly Miguel Serrano are essentially giving us the same initiatic teaching. God is the great going forth of a terrible infinite freedom that no words can express. No vain intellectualizing of profane men can hold onto him or understand. We are charged by this freedom to endure a phase of extreme flux, which tries us in the fires of life. From there we learn to reconcile these opposing forces in ourselves and become not only individuals, but crystallized reflections of this freedom. We become the Divine Anthropos (Kristos, Wotan). If we fail to become whole, our individuality face dissolution into the elements. If we succeed, we become individuated Gods. We also become a terrible going forth of infinite and primordial freedom – albeit in a more fractal form. This freedom is not to be an amoral pig or Crowley-esque shit-eater, there are far greater vistas out there than sex and social mores. We are going to have life more abundantly, life with even greater meaning.

One might argue that I am also putting a cosmology in a box. On the surface it does appear so. However, my written words are not gospel. I do understand the diabolical deception of human language and use it only as a necessary evil for those who will one day take this much further. A man of wisdom is not always a kind and compassionate being. It is very important to not confuse sentimentality with truth. Wisdom can often be very detached from this world. It can be incredibly harsh as Bodhidharma, that blue-eyed devil, revealed to those brave souls courageous enough to follow him. The currents of modernity have created a soft-intellectual knowledge of things and not a hard-earned wisdom. In all of this, the most important thing to remember is that if you have not suffered for your wisdom, it is not real.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 65 other followers